Bill Gribble wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 05:09:38PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > No. Because this returns the "wrong thing". For an ibm stock
> > account, it would return IBM. Whereas both the main window, and
> > the register need USD (the "reporting currency").
>
> It's my posit
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 05:09:38PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No. Because this returns the "wrong thing". For an ibm stock
> account, it would return IBM. Whereas both the main window, and
> the register need USD (the "reporting currency").
It's my position (call it "position B" :) tha
It's been rumoured that Christian Stimming said:
>
> But in the current implementation nothing related to accounts is called
> "reporting currency", so it is confusing to start with that now.
Yes, and part of my proposal is to change the name. To avoid future
confusion.
> Do you
> mean the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 14:00, you wrote:
> > I disagree with Linas in that accounts should have a
> > "reporting currency".
>
> I wasn't trying to say that they should. I was instead stating that
> that they do, in the current implementation. That's how
