Derek Atkins wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This html appears not to be the html I expected to get looking at the
>> >> scheme code.
>> >>
>> >> Why is this? I would much rather get the scheme generated html than
>> >> this.
>>
> >
> > Because GtkHTML sucks.
> >
> > What you're seeing is HTML fed to Gtk
Arthur Ralfs writes:
> Since the opinion of GtkHTML does not appear to be high in this context
> I presume
> there must me some other reason for its use.
History/legacy use. In the mean time, the resurgence of competition
between browsers has led to more options. GtkWebkit is probably right
up
Josh Sled wrote:
> Arthur Ralfs writes:
>
>> Why is this? I would much rather get the scheme generated html than this.
>>
>
> I believe we ask gtkhtml to do the export, and it serializes its own
> representation of the document rather than emitting the generated html.
> I'd agree that it'
Hi,
Quoting Arthur Ralfs :
[snip]
>
> This html appears not to be the html I expected to get looking at the
> scheme code.
>
> Why is this? I would much rather get the scheme generated html than this.
Because GtkHTML sucks.
What you're seeing is HTML fed to GtkHTML and then re-exported
from Gt
Arthur Ralfs writes:
> Why is this? I would much rather get the scheme generated html than this.
I believe we ask gtkhtml to do the export, and it serializes its own
representation of the document rather than emitting the generated html.
I'd agree that it's less than ideal, but such is the repor
Hello gnucash developers,
I've recently joined this list because I was looking at the report
system.
Examining a simple hello world report I see an elaborate scheme
structure to generate html. However when I export the report as
html I don't see any evidence of this scheme generated html.
To be
