Re: python-gnucash (swig-ification against 2.0.1)

2007-01-18 Thread Tom Purl
> You would still need to wait for someone to create a swig wrapper for > your specific language. Ok, thanks. > Also, it's unlikely you'd be able to write a report per se in a > different language even if someone did write the bindings for you. > The fact that we're using swig should make those b

Re: python-gnucash (swig-ification against 2.0.1)

2007-01-18 Thread Mark Jenkins
I wrote: > (Ubuntu users can use the repository with these lines > deb http://carrot:3142/repo.parit.ca/ dapper/ > deb-src http://carrot:3142/repo.parit.ca/ dapper/ > ) Oops, I copied and pasted without looking carefully. Should of been: deb http://repo.parit.ca/ dapper/ deb-src http://repo.parit

Re: python-gnucash (swig-ification against 2.0.1)

2007-01-18 Thread Tom Purl
Once again, please forgive my swig/g-wrap ignorance, but what does this mean for a guy like me who would love to be able to automate some GnuCash-related tasks or create text reports using Perl or Python? Would I still need to wait for someone to create a swig wrapper that's specific to a language,

Re: python-gnucash (swig-ification against 2.0.1)

2007-01-18 Thread Derek Atkins
You would still need to wait for someone to create a swig wrapper for your specific language. Also, it's unlikely you'd be able to write a report per se in a different language even if someone did write the bindings for you. The fact that we're using swig should make those bindings easier, but i

Re: python-gnucash (swig-ification against 2.0.1)

2007-01-18 Thread Tom Purl
>> It looks like someone created python bindings, using swig, against >> 1.9.8. > > Hi, I'm the developer. The website is out of date. I have a newer > version in our apt repository that is built against 2.0.1 >... > The code's in rough shape, which is why I've been holding off announcing > the e

Re: python-gnucash (swig-ification against 2.0.1)

2007-01-18 Thread Derek Atkins
Just so you're aware, GnuCash SVN (trunk) has switched from g-wrap to swig for the guile bindings, so that may make it even easier for you going forward. -derek Quoting Mark Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Josh Sled wrote: >> It looks like someone created python bindings, using swig, against >> 1

Re: python-gnucash (swig-ification against 2.0.1)

2007-01-18 Thread Andreas Köhler
Hi, On Do, 2007-01-18 at 09:21 -0600, Mark Jenkins wrote: > Josh Sled wrote: > > It looks like someone created python bindings, using swig, against > > 1.9.8. > > Hi, I'm the developer. The website is out of date. I have a newer > version in our apt repository that is built against 2.0.1 [...] >

Re: python-gnucash (swig-ification against 2.0.1)

2007-01-18 Thread Mark Jenkins
Josh Sled wrote: > It looks like someone created python bindings, using swig, against > 1.9.8. Hi, I'm the developer. The website is out of date. I have a newer version in our apt repository that is built against 2.0.1 http://repo.parit.ca/dapper/python-gnucash_0.7.29-1.tar.gz http://repo.parit.c