> You would still need to wait for someone to create a swig wrapper for
> your specific language.
Ok, thanks.
> Also, it's unlikely you'd be able to write a report per se in a
> different language even if someone did write the bindings for you.
> The fact that we're using swig should make those b
I wrote:
> (Ubuntu users can use the repository with these lines
> deb http://carrot:3142/repo.parit.ca/ dapper/
> deb-src http://carrot:3142/repo.parit.ca/ dapper/
> )
Oops, I copied and pasted without looking carefully. Should of been:
deb http://repo.parit.ca/ dapper/
deb-src http://repo.parit
Once again, please forgive my swig/g-wrap ignorance, but what does this
mean for a guy like me who would love to be able to automate some
GnuCash-related tasks or create text reports using Perl or Python?
Would I still need to wait for someone to create a swig wrapper that's
specific to a language,
You would still need to wait for someone to create a swig wrapper for
your specific language. Also, it's unlikely you'd be able to write
a report per se in a different language even if someone did write
the bindings for you. The fact that we're using swig should make
those bindings easier, but i
>> It looks like someone created python bindings, using swig, against
>> 1.9.8.
>
> Hi, I'm the developer. The website is out of date. I have a newer
> version in our apt repository that is built against 2.0.1
>...
> The code's in rough shape, which is why I've been holding off announcing
> the e
Just so you're aware, GnuCash SVN (trunk) has switched from g-wrap to
swig for the guile bindings, so that may make it even easier for you
going forward.
-derek
Quoting Mark Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Josh Sled wrote:
>> It looks like someone created python bindings, using swig, against
>> 1
Hi,
On Do, 2007-01-18 at 09:21 -0600, Mark Jenkins wrote:
> Josh Sled wrote:
> > It looks like someone created python bindings, using swig, against
> > 1.9.8.
>
> Hi, I'm the developer. The website is out of date. I have a newer
> version in our apt repository that is built against 2.0.1
[...]
>
Josh Sled wrote:
> It looks like someone created python bindings, using swig, against
> 1.9.8.
Hi, I'm the developer. The website is out of date. I have a newer
version in our apt repository that is built against 2.0.1
http://repo.parit.ca/dapper/python-gnucash_0.7.29-1.tar.gz
http://repo.parit.c