David Merrill writes:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 04:34:00PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > David Merrill writes:
> > > In light of the discussions we have been having over whether the
> > > account group mechanism should be strictly hierarchical or whether an
> > > account should be allowed to ex
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 04:34:00PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> David Merrill writes:
> > In light of the discussions we have been having over whether the
> > account group mechanism should be strictly hierarchical or whether an
> > account should be allowed to exist within more than one group,
David Merrill writes:
> In light of the discussions we have been having over whether the
> account group mechanism should be strictly hierarchical or whether an
> account should be allowed to exist within more than one group, I am
> considering providing both capabilities in the database.
>
> Fir
In light of the discussions we have been having over whether the
account group mechanism should be strictly hierarchical or whether an
account should be allowed to exist within more than one group, I am
considering providing both capabilities in the database.
First, the group table would define g
