Re: multi-split transaction report

2000-03-06 Thread Christopher Browne
On Mon, 06 Mar 2000 00:25:17 CST, the world broke into rejoicing as Bryan Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > thanks. especially since the refinements you suggested are to the original > code, not my modifications. :) > > > Not bad; I suggest couple of refinements, involving adding some usefu

Re: multi-split transaction report

2000-03-05 Thread Bryan Larsen
thanks. especially since the refinements you suggested are to the original code, not my modifications. :) > Not bad; I suggest couple of refinements, involving adding some useful > abstractions that essentially pull out the HTML dependancy. this was in the pipe, but I wasn't doing it as well a

Re: multi-split transaction report

2000-03-05 Thread Christopher Browne
On Sun, 05 Mar 2000 04:19:14 CST, the world broke into rejoicing as Bryan Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > my "learn scheme" project was to support multi-splits on the account > transactions report. > > I'm not sending it out as a patch because I have a bunch of budget crap > littering the fil

multi-split transaction report

2000-03-05 Thread Bryan Larsen
my "learn scheme" project was to support multi-splits on the account transactions report. I'm not sending it out as a patch because I have a bunch of budget crap littering the file as well. as this is my first scheme code, if you scheme experts could comment, that would be appreciated. for src/