On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:19:27AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Do you not read this list? I just sent email about this
> yesterday.
Irregularly :)
> PS: It looks like Andreas applied your patch.
Thanks!
Thomas
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-
Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While running autogen.sh, I had lots of warnings of the kind
> /Makefile.am:3: `:='-style assignments are not portable
> I'm using automake-1.10.
Do you not read this list? I just sent email about this
yesterday.
-derek
PS: It looks like Andrea
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 07:09:52PM -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> It looks like a pretty trivial change to configure.in to look for a
> different package name/version of goffice, around line 1103.
>
> I wonder why the package name changed, and if that implies it's not
> compatible. Do you care to make
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 00:59 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> FYI: The new stable release of goffice, 0.4.0, is out, but gnucash's
> configure script only recognizes the old 0.2 and the development 0.3
> branches.
It looks like a pretty trivial change to configure.in to look for a
different package
Hi!
FYI: The new stable release of goffice, 0.4.0, is out, but gnucash's
configure script only recognizes the old 0.2 and the development 0.3
branches.
Would be good to have this fixed :)
Cheers,
Thomas
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnu
