> > Can parts of GnuCash be distributed under GPL v2 or
> later while others
> > are distributed as GPL v2 only? Are these two
> licensing options
> > compatible? I'm just raising this because of the
> recent thread (
> > http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2010-January/thread.html#27
k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) writes:
> rms and I are continuing to try to review all GNU packages wrt GPLv3.
> The LICENSE file for gnucash has the problematic statement:
>
> However, some of the source files are licensed under Version 2 of
> the GNU GPL specifically.
>
> So ... which
gnucash uses goffice which is GPLv2 only
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463248), so if it moves to
GPLv3+ it can't use goffice anymore.
Regards,
Jean
Le dimanche 24 janvier 2010 à 22:17 +, Karl Berry a écrit :
> rms and I are continuing to try to review all GNU packages wrt GPLv3
rms and I are continuing to try to review all GNU packages wrt GPLv3.
The LICENSE file for gnucash has the problematic statement:
However, some of the source files are licensed under Version 2 of
the GNU GPL specifically.
So ... which files are these? Is there any way to change things so
