Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does anyone have any clues as to where I should look for these problems?
I wouldn't spend a lot of time on it.. the 1.8 branch is not long-lived. Make
your local patch to configure.in and just make sure not to send it upstream
with any other patches
On Wednesday 03 November 2004 11:42 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > I can't build under automake2.13 so I can't test whether your Makefile.am
> > patch is required on it's own.
>
> I can go test it again, but 1.8 has worked fine for me on RH9 without
> any kind of change like this. So I really suspect
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i.e. I need to patch to automake2.53
> AC_INIT(src/engine/Transaction.h)
>
> AC_PROG_CC
> +AC_PREREQ(2.53)
>
> before I can build at all. The build then halts unless I add your patch:
> + ${top_builddir}/src/business/business-utils/libgncmod-business-ut
On Wednesday 03 November 2004 1:12 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tuesday 02 November 2004 9:27 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >
> > I've just built 1-8 and your patch is required
i.e. I need to patch to automake2.53
AC_INIT(src/engine/Transaction.h)
AC_PROG
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 02 November 2004 9:27 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> I've just built 1-8 and your patch is required but it DOES fix the problem.
>
> After patching business-ledger/Makefile.am, a make install wasn't sufficient -
> it needed a make clean in busin
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 9:27 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
I've just built 1-8 and your patch is required but it DOES fix the problem.
After patching business-ledger/Makefile.am, a make install wasn't sufficient -
it needed a make clean in business/business-ledger/ and a make install in
src/.
Ho
