Re: gconf2 (was Re: g-wrap (was Re: QOF won't link))

2004-06-20 Thread Linas Vepstas
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 05:37:55PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark: > > > As a side note, corba does have this 'service discovery' feature, this > > thing where you can ask "who holds the gnucash config data" and there > > would come this response "oh, machine 10.0.0.1 holds it", so the us

Re: gconf2 (was Re: g-wrap (was Re: QOF won't link))

2004-06-20 Thread Linas Vepstas
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 02:40:44AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann was heard to remark: > More or less the combination of both is done. If there is no active > gconfd, one is initialized from data stored in (a configurable location > which usually is) $HOME/.gconf. Further instances will than contact this >

Re: gconf2 (was Re: g-wrap (was Re: QOF won't link))

2004-06-20 Thread Linas Vepstas
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:23:23AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists was heard to remark: > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Linas Vepstas wrote: > > > It would be seriously cool if gconf was distributed, so that, e.g. > > when machine 2 shows up on net, its gconf would sync with that from > > machine1.

Re: gconf2 (was Re: g-wrap (was Re: QOF won't link))

2004-06-20 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi. Derek Atkins wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes: >>It would be seriously cool if gconf was distributed, so that, e.g. >>when machine 2 shows up on net, its gconf would sync with that from >>machine1. After sync machine1 could be shut down, or whatever ... >>machines could come

Re: gconf2 (was Re: g-wrap (was Re: QOF won't link))

2004-06-20 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Linas Vepstas wrote: > It would be seriously cool if gconf was distributed, so that, e.g. > when machine 2 shows up on net, its gconf would sync with that from > machine1. After sync machine1 could be shut down, or whatever ... > machines could come & go, join the party & lea

Re: gconf2 (was Re: g-wrap (was Re: QOF won't link))

2004-06-20 Thread Derek Atkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes: > It would be seriously cool if gconf was distributed, so that, e.g. > when machine 2 shows up on net, its gconf would sync with that from > machine1. After sync machine1 could be shut down, or whatever ... > machines could come & go, join the party & le

Re: gconf2 (was Re: g-wrap (was Re: QOF won't link))

2004-06-20 Thread Linas Vepstas
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann was heard to remark: > Derek Atkins wrote: > > show-stopper if you tie a user's gnucash configuration to a single > > machine. I'd rather keep the existing scheme-based configuration than > > lose the ability to have the same desktop on mul