Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wouldn't say broken, just extra verbose. Without looking into it,
> my impression is that gtk-html detection/reporting unusually noisy.
Ahh.. I fixed /that/ last night.. It's a bug in pkg-config which
PKG_CHECK_MODULES() doesn't properly handle.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:23:52AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IMO, if we're interested in quieting configure-noise, there are bigger
> > fish to fry, like noise caused by _our_ sloppy code, instead of noise
> > coming from some stock macro.
>
> I h
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, thanks for explaining this, Neil. I totally misunderstood Derek's
> initial report. I thought that this was halting configure. I now see
> what Derek was talking about.
I was wondering why you were asking the questions you were asking.
I'm sorr
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:51:53AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:02 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
> > (effectively), and I got the following spewage from configure:
> >
> > checking what extra warning flags t
On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:02 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
> (effectively), and I got the following spewage from configure:
>
> checking what extra warning flags to pass to the C compiler... -Werror
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement mv:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:35:46PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>I sent another copy via another mailer to you personally...
> >
> >That one is undamaged and also identical to mine. Do you still see
> >the problem?
>
> Yep. Every time I build fr
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I sent another copy via another mailer to you personally...
That one is undamaged and also identical to mine. Do you still see
the problem?
Yep. Every time I build from an empty lndir tree I see this.
I'm at:
$ glib-gettextize --version
/usr/b
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:51:13PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>The attachement is damaged. Seems to contain random newlines and
> >>'!'s.
> >
> >Actually, the damage isn't completely random. Seems to be about a
> >dozen places where there is lo
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The attachement is damaged. Seems to contain random newlines and
'!'s.
Actually, the damage isn't completely random. Seems to be about a
dozen places where there is localized damage limited to newlines,
spaces and bangs.
Maybe it's not mailer dam
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 07:25:40PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:11:59PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > >On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > >>I just tried to build from a current SVN tr
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:11:59PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >>I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
> >>(effectively), and I got the following spewage fro
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Note: this was with a completely clean checkout; autogen had never
been run before on this tree.
[I didn't look at the script yet, but...] Is that legit usage? I
thought you _have_ to run autogen.sh on the svn tree before configure.
I thought the
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:11:59PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >>I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
> >>(effectively), and I got the following spewage fro
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
> (effectively), and I got the following spewage from configure:
>
> checking what extra warning flags to pass to the C compiler... -Werror
> -Wdeclaration-after-statem
I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
(effectively), and I got the following spewage from configure:
checking what extra warning flags to pass to the C compiler... -Werror
-Wdeclaration-after-statement
mv: cannot stat `po/POTFILES': No such file or directory
./configure
15 matches
Mail list logo
