Re: building 1.8

2005-10-19 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi, this is unfortunate. I haven't seen that weird complaint before, but as I said I have been able to run "make distcheck" in the current 1-8-branch. If you want to, I can upload the tarball to sourceforge (although any of you admins there need to upgrade me to "Release Technician" before I

Re: building 1.8 (was: "make dist" shouldn't create doxygen documentation)

2005-10-18 Thread Chris Lyttle
Still no joy compiling it here. If I touch dummy.c to make this go away it just fails late complaining about not having 'ChangeLog' in the po directory. No friggin idea why that is. I officially give up trying to make a 1.8.12 release. Chris On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:42 +0200, Christian Stimming w

Re: building 1.8 (was: "make dist" shouldn't create doxygen documentation)

2005-10-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Sunday 16 October 2005 10:23 pm, you wrote: > Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2005 22:59 schrieb Neil Williams: > > Can you run make check on the entire tree without any errors now? > > I am talking about the gnucash-1-8-branch, right? Umm, no. I was thinking of G2. Oops. Ne'er mind, I'm going to bed n

Re: building 1.8

2005-10-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The other remark from you rather sounds like you should consider > switching to a different distribution for some time. The world > really doesn't revolve around Debian ;-) does it. I have of course > zero idea why things wouldn't work on Debian, an

Re: building 1.8 (was: "make dist" shouldn't create doxygen documentation)

2005-10-16 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2005 22:59 schrieb Neil Williams: > On Sunday 16 October 2005 9:42 pm, Christian Stimming wrote: > > I'm now testing the tarball here... well, it works and runs "make > > distcheck". I guess it should work for you as well? > > You can run make distcheck? Why won't that work

Re: building 1.8 (was: "make dist" shouldn't create doxygen documentation)

2005-10-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Sunday 16 October 2005 9:42 pm, Christian Stimming wrote: > I'm now testing the tarball here... well, it works and runs "make > distcheck". I guess it should work for you as well? You can run make distcheck? Why won't that work on Debian? I get scheme errors! Can you run make check on the ent

Re: building 1.8 (was: "make dist" shouldn't create doxygen documentation)

2005-10-16 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi Chris, actually that file "dummy.c" never existed on my system at all. Since for whatever reason "make dist" required it, I just created such an empty file (touch dummy.c) and from there on, everything worked. I'm now testing the tarball here... well, it works and runs "make distcheck". I g

Re: building 1.8 (was: "make dist" shouldn't create doxygen documentation)

2005-10-15 Thread Chris Lyttle
Damm tried again on my stable gentoo system and no go :( Fails in the testing phase with; make[2]: Entering directory `/home/chris/cvs/gnucash-test' rm -f make-gnucash-patch.tmp sed < make-gnucash-patch.in > make-gnucash-patch.tmp \ -e 's:@-PERL-@:/usr/bin/perl:g' chmod +x make-gnucash

Re: building 1.8 (was: "make dist" shouldn't create doxygen documentation)

2005-10-11 Thread Christian Stimming
Dear Chris, I regularly build 1.8 on my suse9.3 system, which is "relatively modern" (the successor suse10.0 was released just last week). I think I even completed "make distcheck" successfully a few days ago, but I might be wrong on that. However, similar to Derek I haven't tried this with a