Re: build system proposals for gnome2-branch

2005-08-28 Thread Derek Atkins
I think that doing this in the g2 branch is fine. -derek Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > the build system proposals of 2005-07-20 somehow got lost. So here's an > update. I've put together a proposal of what can be changed in the > gnome2-branch. I'd suggest > > -

build system proposals for gnome2-branch

2005-08-27 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi all, the build system proposals of 2005-07-20 somehow got lost. So here's an update. I've put together a proposal of what can be changed in the gnome2-branch. I'd suggest - removal of acinclude.m4 -- it contains heaps of very old, legacy macros - removal of ltmain.sh -- it should be create

Re: build system proposals for gnome2-branch

2005-07-20 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:22:09PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Ok, I tested these changes and they pass the autogen/make/make > > install/execute test. I did notice a couple things. I now see *many* > > cases of: > > > > *** Warning: Linking t

Re: build system proposals for gnome2-branch

2005-07-20 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I suspect this might be due to the "libtool relink" issue, where it wants > to > > relink all your libraries during "make install". We had a workaround in > our > > version of ltmain.sh; it's possible your version does not. > > Yes, that is what i

Re: build system proposals for gnome2-branch

2005-07-20 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ok, I tested these changes and they pass the autogen/make/make > install/execute test. I did notice a couple things. I now see *many* > cases of: > > *** Warning: Linking the shared library FOO.la against the loadable module > *** FOO.so is not por

Re: build system proposals for gnome2-branch

2005-07-20 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:08:08PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:54:49PM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > ok, now I've put together a proposal of what can be changed in the > > gnome2-branch. I'd suggest > > > > - removal of acinclude.m4 -- it co

Re: build system proposals for gnome2-branch

2005-07-20 Thread Phil Longstaff
On July 20, 2005 04:54 pm, Christian Stimming wrote: > Hi all, > - changing of macros/autogen.sh, diff attached. > > The changes to autogen.sh are > > - ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I $GNOME2_PATH/share/aclocal $ACLOCAL_FLAGS" > + # if GNOME2_PATH contains several directories, separate them properly > +

Re: build system proposals for gnome2-branch

2005-07-20 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:54:49PM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote: > Hi all, > > ok, now I've put together a proposal of what can be changed in the > gnome2-branch. I'd suggest > > - removal of acinclude.m4 -- it contains heaps of very old, legacy macros > > - adding 2-3 unavoidable legacy ma

build system proposals for gnome2-branch

2005-07-20 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi all, ok, now I've put together a proposal of what can be changed in the gnome2-branch. I'd suggest - removal of acinclude.m4 -- it contains heaps of very old, legacy macros - adding 2-3 unavoidable legacy macros into file macros/legacy_macros.m4 (attached) - removal of ltmain.sh -- it sho