"Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So far you haven't even started to mention that you might be able to
>> submit code for yourself. Iff you intend to do that, then we are
>> expecting questions like "I want to do xy. How can it be done the
>> easiest way?"
>
> A little bit like this,
"Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Obviously, but I get the impression that attempts to develop the project
> in certain directions, or to implement certain features, will be blocked
>>From the project because "it's supposed to work this way, and not that
> way", even if the new functi
"Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, August 7, 2006 8:03 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> If you specifically want something web-based, you might want to
>> look at SQL-Ledger. GnuCash is meant to be a desktop app. There
>> is ONE developer who thinks there might be use as a web ap
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:01:41AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Mon, August 7, 2006 8:03 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> > If you specifically want something web-based, you might want to
> > look at SQL-Ledger. GnuCash is meant to be a desktop app. There
> > is ONE developer who thinks there mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Stimming schrieb:
> - (I assume you are slightly familiar with the scheme programming
> language. If not, would be a good read.)
oops, forgot to add the URL in the last sentence. It should have
read: If not, http://www.htdp.org/2003-09
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Conrad Canterford schrieb:
> On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 15:36 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
>>> You cannot fault them for rejecting any suggestion that they should
>>> devote the next several years worth of their precious development time
>>> to your suggest
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 15:36 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > You cannot fault them for rejecting any suggestion that they should
> > devote the next several years worth of their precious development time
> > to your suggestion instead of working on issues and features which are
> > affecting them o
On Tue, August 8, 2006 2:47 pm, Conrad Canterford wrote:
> Or c) take a fork, and develop it in the direction you want it to go.
> Personally, I think that would be bad for all concerned, but if you feel
> strongly enough about it, this is an option for you.
This has been considered, too.
> Sure
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 11:56 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> I have reached the point where Gnucash in it's current form is no longer
> useful, and I have to make a decision to either a) develop the software
> further and submit patches for inclusion into the trunk, or b) drop
> Gnucash and invest th
On Tue, August 8, 2006 12:11 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
> What was the original question again?
It was a response to the following quote:
> On Mon, August 7, 2006 8:03 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> If you specifically want something web-based, you might want to
>> look at SQL-Ledger. GnuC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Graham Leggett schrieb:
> I have reached the point where Gnucash in it's current form is no longer
> useful, and I have to make a decision to either a) develop the software
> further and submit patches for inclusion into the trunk, or b) drop
> Gnucash
On Tue, August 8, 2006 11:26 am, Christian Stimming wrote:
> *cough* Nobody gets criticised for suggesting new things *and*
> submitting patches to implement that (or outlining the actual
> implementation path *in detail*). What we *do* criticise is when people
> suggest "please do x and y" but ex
On Tue, August 8, 2006 11:12 am, Andreas Köhler wrote:
> to me it sounds more like NIY ;-)
>
> -- andi5
>
> PS: yet
Obviously, but I get the impression that attempts to develop the project
in certain directions, or to implement certain features, will be blocked
from the project because "it's supp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Graham Leggett schrieb:
> On Mon, August 7, 2006 8:03 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> If you specifically want something web-based, you might want to
>> look at SQL-Ledger. GnuCash is meant to be a desktop app. There
>> is ONE developer who thinks ther
Hi,
On Di, 2006-08-08 at 11:01 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Mon, August 7, 2006 8:03 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> > If you specifically want something web-based, you might want to
> > look at SQL-Ledger. GnuCash is meant to be a desktop app. There
> > is ONE developer who thinks there might
On Mon, August 7, 2006 8:03 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> If you specifically want something web-based, you might want to
> look at SQL-Ledger. GnuCash is meant to be a desktop app. There
> is ONE developer who thinks there might be use as a web app,
> but I think he stands alone in that goal.
It's
Tom Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've done a quick search on the mailing lists and only found two
> references to a web front end from july 05. Is there any work on this -
> I'd be interested to help.
Nope.
> I should add I haven't yet used gnucash but I am an experienced ASP.NET
> pro
I've done a quick search on the mailing lists and only found two
references to a web front end from july 05. Is there any work on this -
I'd be interested to help.
I should add I haven't yet used gnucash but I am an experienced ASP.NET
programmer and I was about to start on a web based accountin
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 2:28 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Please CC: All replies back to gnucash-user!
or even gnucash-devel
:-))
> I've answered your question in a previous post. Please read the
> -user archives for the last couple days.
The devel archives are here:
https://lists.gnucash.org/pipe
On Monday 04 July 2005 8:46 pm, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > It's important that the data is merged rather than simply hacked into
> > the=20 existing storage. The user must have control over how any
> > conflicts are=20 handled.
>
> It seems to me that the only way it would be likely for a web in
On Monday 04 July 2005 6:09 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be a lot of work to implement a web interface
> frontend for Gnucash.
Personally, I think it would be more reasonable to implement a data access
interface in HTML/PHP/Perl than to replicate the entire program. QSF coul
Hi,
I think it would be a lot of work to implement a web interface
frontend for Gnucash. There is a lot of business logic in the UI.
The "database" has no logic at all, it's just a data storage system.
Also, the current "database" (rdbm) backend is not fully functional,
so that would make it eve
Hi Dev Team,
I am planning to provide a web interface for GNU CASH. Need to know
the feasibility for the same. i functions which are right now
supported in gnuCash will be replicated on to the Web interface, and
will connect to the same DB as the thick client.
Waiting your feedback/help/suggestio
23 matches
Mail list logo
