Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2011 schrieb John Ralls:
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> > If this is for trunk, I'd prefer that we *don't* just fix the current
> > scheme code. We really need to decide what we plan to do with reports
> > for 2.6. We have our current scheme reports
On Apr 14, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Joshua Moore wrote:
>
> It looks like someone has closed this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616608
>
> Is that correct? The last part of this conversation made it sound like it
> would be a good idea to make output validate to 4.01 Transit
ect: Re: Using Standard (Valid) HTML Code According to w3.org
> From: jra...@ceridwen.us
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:46:09 -0700
> CC: mooreviney...@hotmail.com; gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
> To: f.ellenber...@online.de
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 5:04 AM, Frank H. Ellenberg
On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:00 AM, David Goodenough wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 April 2011, John Ralls wrote:
>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Joshua Moore wrote:
>>> I'd be happy to. Many of the problems don't look too difficult, but
>>> someone may need to make a decision about the markup language versi
On Wednesday 13 April 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Joshua Moore wrote:
> > I'd be happy to. Many of the problems don't look too difficult, but
> > someone may need to make a decision about the markup language version
> > that should be used. Right now, it looks like the
On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Joshua Moore wrote:
>
> I'd be happy to. Many of the problems don't look too difficult, but someone
> may need to make a decision about the markup language version that should be
> used. Right now, it looks like the intent is HTML 4.01 Transitional. Is
> there
lse?
Josh
> Subject: Re: Using Standard (Valid) HTML Code According to w3.org
> From: jra...@ceridwen.us
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:46:09 -0700
> CC: mooreviney...@hotmail.com; gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
> To: f.ellenber...@online.de
>
>
> On
On Apr 13, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> If this is for trunk, I'd prefer that we *don't* just fix the current scheme
> code. We really need to decide what we plan to do with reports for 2.6. We
> have our current scheme reports. We have a few eguile reports. We've had a
> sug
o I took something for it.
From: John Ralls
To: Frank H. Ellenberger
Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Sent: Wed, April 13, 2011 9:46:09 AM
Subject: Re: Using Standard (Valid) HTML Code According to w3.org
On Apr 13, 2011, at 5:04 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
> Hey John,
>
&g
On Apr 13, 2011, at 5:04 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
> Hey John,
>
> Am Montag, 11. April 2011 um 17:23:17 schrieb John Ralls:
>> We only need the generated HTML to display correctly in the embedded
>> WebKit, which AFAICT it does.
>
> No, we also offer to export the pages, where they will
Hey John,
Am Montag, 11. April 2011 um 17:23:17 schrieb John Ralls:
> We only need the generated HTML to display correctly in the embedded
> WebKit, which AFAICT it does.
No, we also offer to export the pages, where they will be rendered by any
engine the user has at hand.
Frank
___
On Apr 11, 2011, at 7:04 AM, Joshua Moore wrote:
>
> I saw bug 616608 (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616608) while
> browsing Bugzilla.
>
> "Generated HTML file is not conform to HTML standard."
>
> "You can validate the generated file by http://validator.w3.org/
> It will show
I saw bug 616608 (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616608) while
browsing Bugzilla.
"Generated HTML file is not conform to HTML standard."
"You can validate the generated file by http://validator.w3.org/
It will show several conformation problems. Conform to standard will enhance
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
