--On Monday, March 20, 2006 1:26 PM -0700 David Herman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll file a bug report unless someone knows immediately why this
happens (or why I'm wrong). I have a test file that demonstrates
this problem if it's needed.
I'll also file a bug report either adding data to
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:26:30 -0700
David Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was checking the "new" Advanced Portfolio report and believe that the column
> labeled "Basis" is incorrect. It appears that if there are multiple
> transactions on
> a give stock/fund the value is calculated incor
I tried the balance sheet report in 1.9 yesterday for the first time
and it appears to be not only slow, but also broken. I tracked it down
to the fact that gnc:account-get-comm-balance-at-date sometimes returns
the wrong value. This sounds like a pretty serious bug, but I'm
reasonably sure I
--On March 19, 2006 11:03:06 PM +0100 Christian Stimming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- The text reports are *significantly* slower than in 1.8; e.g. the
current "balance sheet" takes 8 secs with the standard options and
in 1.8 this was 3.5 secs; same for the "account summary"; the
current "inc
Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - The menus for "Assets&Liabilities" and "Income&Expenses" are too
> full; you don't find the report you were looking for, unless you
> knew in advance it has to be in that menu. Admittantly, this was a
> problem in 1.8 as well. In SVN the "A&L" men
Has anyone been using the reports in current SVN seriously? I haven't so far,
and what I saw when I tried this the last days gave me a bit of trouble with
our current reports. I'm almost inclined to activate my "report-generating
monster" activity... below is a rant about my initial try on repor
