www.sander-webdesign.nl
Let me know what you think I'd be glad to help and thanks for the
great software which I daily use.
Kind regards,
Sander de Vries
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/lis
Hello fellow developers!
I just wanted to say thank you for your marvelous work.
I know about GnuCash since late nineties, but never really got the
hang of using it. The main problem for me was probably that the double
entry system sounded more complicated than it really was and also the
accounti
e 1.8. I'm not sure which PDF you're
referring to since you don't identify it ... but if it's "A User Guide to
GnuCash" by David Gilbert dated Nov 4, 2002 (from
<http://www.object-refinery.com/gnucash/index.html>), then claims to only be
current as of the 1.6 re
>>>>> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday, gnucash 2.0.1 packages migrated into the Debian testing
> distribution, which means that (barring unforeseen problems) they will
> be in the upcoming etch release. On behalf of a jillion Debian us
On Tuesday, gnucash 2.0.1 packages migrated into the Debian testing
distribution, which means that (barring unforeseen problems) they will
be in the upcoming etch release. On behalf of a jillion Debian users,
thanks for all the hard work in making the 2.0 release happen.
Thomas
On Sunday 26 February 2006 4:31 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Events should always be a power of 2. This way bitmasking events
> works quickly and efficiently. It does, however, limit the number
> of events you can have.
It's still going to be more than we had under gnc-event.
:-)
It should be plen
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> They should always be specified as based off some constant identifier,
>> rather than a particular value. I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> Why? This probably sounds obvious to you but if new identifiers are expected
> to be based on QOF_DEFAULT_LIMIT +
On Saturday 25 February 2006 9:24 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
> > > /** Allow scope for more defaults in future. Additional
> > > event identifiers must be larger than this. */
> > > -#define QOF_DEFAULT_LIMIT 10
> > > +#define QOF_DEFAULT_EVENT_LIMIT QOF_EVENT__LAST
> >
> > Josh - why was this a bug?
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 20:53 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > --- gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofevent.h 2006-02-21 21:46:07 UTC (rev
> > 13351) +++ gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofevent.h 2006-02-21 23:10:33 UTC
> > (rev 13352) @@ -50,11 +50,12 @@
> > #define QOF_EVENT_REMOVE (1 << 4)
> > +#def
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 11:10 pm, Joshua Sled wrote:
Author: jsled
+ * lib/libqof/qof/qofevent.[ch] (QOF_DEFAULT_EVENT_LIMIT): rename, set
+ to reasonable value (the last-defined event).
Modified: gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofeven
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 11:10 pm, Joshua Sled wrote:
> Author: jsled
> + * lib/libqof/qof/qofevent.[ch] (QOF_DEFAULT_EVENT_LIMIT): rename, set
> + to reasonable value (the last-defined event).
> Modified: gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofevent.h
> ===
er quality software, and it helps the
user understand. I, for one, would've had a very hard time with gnucash
if the documentation (and translation) wasn't so good.
Thanks alot.
Simon Eilting.
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EM
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I'm not sure how an auto-incrementing txn number is useful in the
> general case.
Actually at the time I was bookkeeping for our company I had wished I had
that feature too ;-)
Greetings to you hackers,
*t
--
"Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is this something other than hitting '+' in the "num" column? I still
>> don't understand the usage scenario for this "feature". Could you please
>> run through a working example of how you would use this?
>
> Uhhh - "+" might be it
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Derek Atkins wrote:
> "Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 7 May 2004, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not sure how an auto-incrementing txn number is useful in the
> >> general case.
> >
> > Actually at the time I was bookkeeping for our
"Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 7 May 2004, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure how an auto-incrementing txn number is useful in the
>> general case.
>
> Actually at the time I was bookkeeping for our company I had wished I had
> that feature too ;-)
Is th
On Friday 07 May 2004 9:15, Ben Pracht wrote:
> For what its worth, I wanted to take the time to say thanks to all those
> who developed this product,
I was a grateful user too until recently - I know Derek, Lynas and all the
others will appreciate your gratitude. If you do have the des
Hi,
Ben Pracht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For what its worth, I wanted to take the time to say thanks to all those who
> developed this product, especially the more recent versions. It is
> one of my
> favorite open source projects. Here's why:
Thanks for the feedbac
For what its worth, I wanted to take the time to say thanks to all those who
developed this product, especially the more recent versions. It is one
of my
favorite open source projects. Here's why:
* I can actually use the debit/credit paradigm, rather than a simpleton
checkbook app
To all"
Downloaded the Mandrake 7.0 Gnucash 1.4.1 rpm and it installed perfectly. I
personal thanks to the person that made it, and to those that posted it on the
site. It works. Much thanks.
--
Ralph F. De Witt
Proud user of Mandrake 7.1 Linux
Register Linux User
ICQ #49993234
No Wi
20 matches
Mail list logo
