Re: Speeding up reports

2009-03-09 Thread Phil Longstaff
On March 9, 2009 12:46:54 pm Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 02:03:57PM -0800, Charles Day wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Mike Alexander wrote: > > > Has anyone looked at > > > to see if my patch makes any sense?

Re: Speeding up reports

2009-03-09 Thread Charles Day
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Andrew Sackville-West < and...@swclan.homelinux.org> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 02:03:57PM -0800, Charles Day wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Mike Alexander wrote: > > > > > Has anyone looked at >

Re: Speeding up reports

2009-03-09 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 02:03:57PM -0800, Charles Day wrote: > On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Mike Alexander wrote: > > > Has anyone looked at > > to see if my patch makes any sense? It speeds up some reports (e.g. > > Income Statement) by a fa

Re: Speeding up reports

2009-03-08 Thread Charles Day
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Mike Alexander wrote: > Has anyone looked at > to see if my patch makes any sense? It speeds up some reports (e.g. > Income Statement) by a factor of 50 or so with largish files. It seems > to work for me, but it

Speeding up reports

2009-03-07 Thread Mike Alexander
Has anyone looked at to see if my patch makes any sense? It speeds up some reports (e.g. Income Statement) by a factor of 50 or so with largish files. It seems to work for me, but it affects the report infrastructure and I haven't tried to te