Le lun 14/11/2005 à 03:33, David Hampton a écrit :
> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 12:49 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
>
> > The rule here is that we should create an account-tree page when a
> > main-window is created which doesn't otherwise have an account-tree
> > page. You want to hook in [:)] at a point a
Le lun 14/11/2005 à 03:33, David Hampton a écrit :
> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 12:49 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
>
> > The rule here is that we should create an account-tree page when a
> > main-window is created which doesn't otherwise have an account-tree
> > page. You want to hook in [:)] at a point
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 12:49 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> The rule here is that we should create an account-tree page when a
> main-window is created which doesn't otherwise have an account-tree
> page. You want to hook in [:)] at a point after the UI is created, but
> you don't want to create an acc
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 19:00 +0100, Didier Vidal wrote:
> > Hmm. With this patch, the hook is registered at account-tree
> > plugin-page class-initialization time, and the hook applies to all new
> > books, regardless of origin. That doesn't seem quite right on either
> > count...
> >
>
> What's
> Hmm. With this patch, the hook is registered at account-tree
> plugin-page class-initialization time, and the hook applies to all new
> books, regardless of origin. That doesn't seem quite right on either
> count...
>
What's the difference with the following, in src/gnome/druid-hierarchy.c
?
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:54 +0100, Didier Vidal wrote:
> However, I have a few problems with this architecture:
>- The GUI actions (in this case, open the account hierarchy druid,
> open a new account tree page) are managed by a class in the engine
> module. That's odd to me. engine should be
Hello,
When I wrote the "Open the account page after creating a new file" patch
(https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-patches/2005-November/016979.html),
I used the same mechanism than the one that is used to launch the account
hierarchy druid (hooks in the engine). It looked to me to be
