On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 01:02:52PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>I don't have a good solution, at present ... just bringing it up.
> >>Probably the right thing is for SXes to just suck it up and model
> >>template transactions seperately from the "
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I don't have a good solution, at present ... just bringing it up.
>> Probably the right thing is for SXes to just suck it up and model
>> template transactions seperately from the "real"
>> accounts/transactions/splits, though there's some serious do
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:31:40PM -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 12:04 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > There's a deeper modeling issue with SXes. We use a seperate, parallel
> > > AccountGroup to store template transaction data, in w
