Re: automake warnings

2015-02-05 Thread Geert Janssens
On Thursday 05 February 2015 14:21:00 Alex Aycinena wrote: > When I run './autogen.sh' on my Fedora 21 machine, I get the > following: > > Makefile.am:10: warning: source file 'util/guile.c' is in a > subdirectory, Makefile.am:10: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled > automake: warning: possib

Re: automake warnings

2015-02-05 Thread Alex Aycinena
OK - thanks for info. Alex On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:48 PM, John Ralls wrote: > > > On Feb 5, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Alex Aycinena > wrote: > > > > When I run './autogen.sh' on my Fedora 21 machine, I get the following: > > > > Makefile.am:10: warning: source file 'util/guile.c' is in a subdirectory

Re: automake warnings

2015-02-05 Thread John Ralls
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Alex Aycinena wrote: > > When I run './autogen.sh' on my Fedora 21 machine, I get the following: > > Makefile.am:10: warning: source file 'util/guile.c' is in a subdirectory, > Makefile.am:10: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled > automake: warning: possible fo

Automake, Schmautomake (was Re: Automake warnings in lib/goffice on Debian)

2005-09-16 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Friday 02 September 2005 10:27 pm, David Hampton wrote: Log Message: --- Automake doesn't cause warnings in lib/goffice any more, so remove the message telling the user to ignore them. :-( The underlying changes in the dependencies of gof

Re: Automake warnings in lib/goffice on Debian

2005-09-16 Thread Josh Sled
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 14:55 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > I would advice against -Wno-error but rather switching off those > > particular warnings as described above. OTOH of course goffice shouldn't > > be fixed by us but rather by upstream. > > I think it's a case of our goffice being an incom

Re: Automake warnings in lib/goffice on Debian

2005-09-16 Thread Emmanuel Pacaud
Hi, Le vendredi 16 septembre 2005 à 15:17 +0200, Christian Stimming a écrit : >I would advice against -Wno-error but rather switching off those > particular warnings as described above. OTOH of course goffice shouldn't > be fixed by us but rather by upstream. > AFAIK, gnucash2 currently use an

Re: Automake warnings in lib/goffice on Debian

2005-09-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Friday 16 September 2005 3:07 pm, Christian Stimming wrote: > > If I customise the Makefile.am's in this way, is there any harm in > > committing the changes to main CVS or should I continue to enforce them > > only locally? > > Only locally, please. I'd recomment that you set your environment >

Re: Automake warnings in lib/goffice on Debian

2005-09-16 Thread Christian Stimming
Neil Williams schrieb: Besides, you can switch off this particular annoying "pointer-signedness-warnings" by -Wno-pointer-sign. That is probably the best option for you. Aha! Thanks Christian. As you recommend, I would much rather ignore specific warnings than ignore everything. If I custom

Re: Automake warnings in lib/goffice on Debian

2005-09-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Friday 16 September 2005 2:17 pm, Christian Stimming wrote: > Note that these warning will occur *if and only if* you use gcc4, which > is still not yet the default in many distributions. As unusual as it is > for Debian :-) , in this case the default compiler of Debian is a higher > version tha

Re: Automake warnings in lib/goffice on Debian

2005-09-16 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi Neil, Neil Williams schrieb: Log Message: --- Automake doesn't cause warnings in lib/goffice any more, so remove the message telling the user to ignore them. Some files generate dozens of warnings like: gog-error-bar.c:349: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signednes