tboldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you are probably right in your assesment of double
> entry/single entry - however - and there is an however, How many
> non-professionals do you know that think in terms of double entry
> accounting??
This is a straw man. There are lots of people usin
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2000, tboldt wrote:
> > Under this view I "transfer" funds and "move" transactions. For
> > example, I "transferred funds" from account A to account B using the
> > register window for account A. Later, I decide that account was the wrong
> > source of
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2000, tboldt wrote:
> > Under this view I "transfer" funds and "move" transactions. For
> > example, I "transferred funds" from account A to account B using the
> > register window for account A. Later, I decide that account was the wrong
> > source of the funds and account C shou
On Fri, 02 Jun 2000, tboldt wrote:
> Under this view I "transfer" funds and "move" transactions. For
> example, I "transferred funds" from account A to account B using the
> register window for account A. Later, I decide that account was the wrong
> source of the funds and account C should be the
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jun 2000, Bill Gribble wrote:
> > tboldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I would have to agree - having the ability to transfer a transaction from
> > > one account to another using a field in the transaction entry is going to
> > > be very confusing. You
On Thu, 01 Jun 2000, Bill Gribble wrote:
> tboldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would have to agree - having the ability to transfer a transaction from
> > one account to another using a field in the transaction entry is going to
> > be very confusing. You are mixing entry fields for the trans
tboldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would have to agree - having the ability to transfer a transaction from one
> account to another using a field in the transaction entry is going to be very
> confusing. You are mixing entry fields for the transaction with actions done
> to the transaction.
A
Paul Fenwick wrote:
> G'day GnuCashers,
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:31:16PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
>
> > Are you talking about the transfer field on the transaction line in
> > multiline mode? That field wasn't there previously, the space was just
> > blank. The new field (currently call
G'day Dave and GnuCashers,
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 10:42:56PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> Ok, I see what you mean now, it's just the blank split for
> which the behavior needs to change back to the old, right?
> I will do that for the next release.
*huge grin* That's exactly what I would li
>
> --hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> G'day GnuCashers,
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:31:16PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
>
> > Are you talking about the transfer field on the transaction line in
> > multiline mo
G'day GnuCashers,
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:31:16PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> Are you talking about the transfer field on the transaction line in
> multiline mode? That field wasn't there previously, the space was just
> blank. The new field (currently called 'transfer to') allows you to
>
> > Well, it is pretty confusing, so we may just be better off taking
> > it out for 1.4. It actually works exactly the same as in 1.3.7,
> > with the exception that, in multi-line mode, where there used to
> > be a blank space in the transaction line, there is now a field
> > you can use to move
> > I have this problem too. I'm using multi-line mode.
> >
> > Terminology:
> > proto-transaction: a transaction which is being entered in the register
> > window onto a blank transaction, and is still in one line mode (or has one
> > blank split displayed below...).
> >
> > In gnucash 1.3.7, t
> I have this problem too. I'm using multi-line mode.
>
> Terminology:
> proto-transaction: a transaction which is being entered in the register
> window onto a blank transaction, and is still in one line mode (or has one
> blank split displayed below...).
>
> In gnucash 1.3.7, the transfer fiel
I have this problem too. I'm using multi-line mode.
Terminology:
proto-transaction: a transaction which is being entered in the register
window onto a blank transaction, and is still in one line mode (or has
one
blank split displayed below...).
In gnucash 1.3.7, the transfer field is labelled `T
> --VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> G'day everyone,
>
> It's good to be back on the mailing list. I thought everyone
> had just gone really quiet for a while. Unfortunately this means
> I'm a little behind in
16 matches
Mail list logo
