Rob Browning, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>If SWIG does a good job, then yes, but if it's not going to provide a
>good solution, then I'd rather just see each interested group create
>and maintain bindings for that language until/if/unless there's a
>unified solution that actuall
"Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suspect that having easy bindings for Perl, Python, Tcl/Tk, and
> Ruby pretty much says that we'll use SWIG.
If SWIG does a good job, then yes, but if it's not going to provide a
good solution, then I'd rather just see each interested gr
Rob Browning, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:20:05 Clinton Popetz wrote:
> | One key advantage of doing it in SWIG is that SWIG can spew out Python
> | interfaces as well, and I hear there are people who actually like
> | programming in Python. :)
>
>Pyth
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:20:05 Clinton Popetz wrote:
| One key advantage of doing it in SWIG is that SWIG can spew out Python
| interfaces as well, and I hear there are people who actually like
| programming in Python. :)
|
Python is much nicer than perl anyways. ;-)
I like it a whole lo
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:34:00PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> "Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay. I'll look for this. If we're going to have to update a major
> > portion of the Perl API, we might want to just use XS. This would free
> > us from the dependency
"Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay. I'll look for this. If we're going to have to update a major
> portion of the Perl API, we might want to just use XS. This would free
> us from the dependency on swig. I have a lot more experience with XS as
> well. :)
Hmm. How
Dave Peticolas, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>Ok. The engine is changing a lot these days, so I would hold off on
>doing any work on it right now. When it's starts to stabilize, anyone
>who is interested should feel free to update the swig API work. This
>will require a fair bit o
"Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." writes:
> Dave Peticolas, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
> >Who uses the Perl API?
>
> I do. But I suspect that I'm one of the few. I just don't have the
> time to (re-)learn scheme. I used lisp in the 80s but these days, I
> only use it for (X)Emacs.
Dave Peticolas, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>Who uses the Perl API?
I do. But I suspect that I'm one of the few. I just don't have the
time to (re-)learn scheme. I used lisp in the 80s but these days, I
only use it for (X)Emacs.
>The reason I ask is that the Perl API is rapi
