On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 13:21 +0100, david.vali...@email.cz wrote:
> Dears Christian, Derek, John, Phil,
>
> first of all, let me express congrats to the great job you've done with
> GnuCash. Its 2.4 release is here thanks to your effort and the skills you've
> put into the project over the years
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:31 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:18 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Anthony Dardis wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:32:44 -0500, Herbert Thoma
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 28.12.2010 22:35, Christian Stimming wrote:
>
>>>
On Dec 29, 2010, at 6:11 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Herbert Thoma writes:
>
>> Hmm, I just would like to point out that GnuCash was kind of a script once:
>> It was a guile script that called the C/gtk/gnome code (OK, the GUI code
>> was not directly scripted). It took us a long time to rework t
On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:18 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Anthony Dardis wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:32:44 -0500, Herbert Thoma
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 28.12.2010 22:35, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Jeff Warnica:
>>
>>
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Anthony Dardis wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:32:44 -0500, Herbert Thoma
> wrote:
>
>> On 28.12.2010 22:35, Christian Stimming wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Jeff Warnica:
>
>
>
>> I am not that sure that an interpreted language is a good
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:32:44 -0500, Herbert Thoma
wrote:
On 28.12.2010 22:35, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Jeff Warnica:
I am not that sure that an interpreted language is a good idea. But I am
an electrical engineer not a computer scientist. So I ten
Herbert Thoma writes:
> Hmm, I just would like to point out that GnuCash was kind of a script once:
> It was a guile script that called the C/gtk/gnome code (OK, the GUI code
> was not directly scripted). It took us a long time to rework this back to
> a C application that called guile for the re
On 29 December 2010 07:28, Mike Alexander wrote:
> --On December 28, 2010 6:09:59 PM -0800 John Ralls
> wrote:
>
>> There are two drivers for reimplementation:
>>
>> 1. One of our goals for 2.6 is to enable multiple simultaneous access
>> to a dataset. In order to get there, large swaths of exist
On 28.12.2010 22:35, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Jeff Warnica:
The question shouldn't be "C++ or not", but "what is the best
2nd/runtime/scripting language?"
In 2010/2011, given that Gnucash isn't a game, there is really only one
choice: Javascript. While ht
On 28.12.2010 22:27, Christian Stimming wrote:
<...>
Lots of good reasoning skipped.
PS: Gee, this message was too long. It should have been split into at least
three different messages. If you read until here, I'll give you a beer in case
we ever meet :-)
So I made it till the end. I'll reme
--On December 28, 2010 6:09:59 PM -0800 John Ralls
wrote:
There are two drivers for reimplementation:
1. One of our goals for 2.6 is to enable multiple simultaneous access
to a dataset. In order to get there, large swaths of existing code
need to be rewritten to interact directly with the dat
On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:16 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
>>
>> On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
2. Gtk+-3.0 is supposed to be released next month. It removes a bunch of
libraries whi
John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
>
> On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
> >> 2. Gtk+-3.0 is supposed to be released next month. It removes a bunch of
> >> libraries which have been deprecated for several years upon which Gnucash
On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
>> 2. Gtk+-3.0 is supposed to be released next month. It removes a bunch of
>> libraries which have been deprecated for several years upon which Gnucash
>> at present depends. All code that depends on th
John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
> 2. Gtk+-3.0 is supposed to be released next month. It removes a bunch of
> libraries which have been deprecated for several years upon which Gnucash
> at present depends. All code that depends on those libraries needs to get
> rewritten or we're not going t
On Dec 28, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Mike Alexander wrote:
> --On December 28, 2010 10:27:48 PM +0100 Christian Stimming
> wrote:
>
>> It seems to me my C++ experiment (as I would call it) has still not
>> yet been understood the way I thought, so I'll elaborate a bit on
>> what I did and what my co
--On December 28, 2010 10:27:48 PM +0100 Christian Stimming
wrote:
It seems to me my C++ experiment (as I would call it) has still not
yet been understood the way I thought, so I'll elaborate a bit on
what I did and what my conclusions are. Incidentally, I'm a
scientist. If I make some claim
2010/12/28 Christian Stimming :
> Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Jeff Warnica:
>> The question shouldn't be "C++ or not", but "what is the best
>> 2nd/runtime/scripting language?"
>>
>> In 2010/2011, given that Gnucash isn't a game, there is really only one
>> choice: Javascript. While http
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Jeff Warnica:
> The question shouldn't be "C++ or not", but "what is the best
> 2nd/runtime/scripting language?"
>
> In 2010/2011, given that Gnucash isn't a game, there is really only one
> choice: Javascript. While http://live.gnome.org/Gjs seems rather dea
Dear Phil,
thanks for bringing up this issue now that we managed to get 2.4.0 out.
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Phil Longstaff:
> A few months ago, Christian Stimming started CuteCash with the aims of
> replacing gtk by Qt/C++. The idea was that development in gtk/C was too
> slow and
I had a long, rambling message, but I'll summarize. Please excuse the
bluntness. I'm not a Gnucash developer, but could be. My opinions might be
technically wrong, and make me a self-destructive asshole, but I'm happy
with that.
The question shouldn't be "C++ or not", but "what is the best
2nd/run
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 08:50 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> I'd much prefer C++ to GObjects, but either is better than the GObjects
> without the G that you used for the dbi/sql backend. We can make the
> transition gradually, as C++ and C inter-operate nicely.
Yeah. That just grew. c++ would have
On Dec 28, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> The subject sounds a bit ominous, but I don't mean it to be.
>
> 2.4.0 is now out the door. Already there are ideas rolling in about the
> next enhancements. I was just about to tackle one of the enhancements
> when instead, I thought I woul
I agree.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bradley Grohs
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 7:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Future of GnuCash
Just a little something from the penut Gallary.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
24 matches
Mail list logo
