Re: Currencies / the accounting equation.

2000-10-03 Thread Bill Gribble
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 07:22:31PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote: > I think this is where our understanding differs. I have never > understood the 'value' as something being exchanged. It's the value of > the 'damount' being exchanged in whatever currency you are doing your > accounting for that acc

Re: Currencies / the accounting equation.

2000-10-02 Thread Christopher Browne
On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 14:37:40 PDT, the world broke into rejoicing as Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > writes: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 04:50:18PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > > I think there is an additional issue for transactions. Consider > > > a transfer between two accounts w

Re: Currencies / the accounting equation.

2000-10-01 Thread Dave Peticolas
Al Snell writes: > On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > > What if we required transactions to have a common valuation currency? > > What if the currency were associated with transactions instead of > > splits, and we always balanced with the value? > > I designed a financial system once

Re: Currencies / the accounting equation.

2000-10-01 Thread Dave Peticolas
writes: > > They are interchangeable for the purposes of balancing, IMO. A split > with both a damount and a value is a concrete statement of a financial > identity. 100 USD is equivalent to 107 EUR in that transaction (for > example), and even stronger: 100 USD was exchanged for 107 EUR in th

Re: Currencies / the accounting equation.

2000-10-01 Thread Bill Gribble
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 02:37:40PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote: > To me, the above transaction says "I took $100 out of my bank account > and put it in my cash account. The $100 dollars coming out of my bank > account is worth 105 Euros and the $100 going into the cash account is > worth 65 Pounds

Re: Currencies / the accounting equation.

2000-10-01 Thread Al Snell
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > What if we required transactions to have a common valuation currency? > What if the currency were associated with transactions instead of > splits, and we always balanced with the value? I designed a financial system once - for internal cost accounting

Re: Currencies / the accounting equation.

2000-10-01 Thread Dave Peticolas
writes: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 04:50:18PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > I think there is an additional issue for transactions. Consider > > a transfer between two accounts with the same security (USD). > > > > AcctDR CR > > bank (USD)

Re: Currencies / the accounting equation.

2000-10-01 Thread Bill Gribble
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 04:50:18PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote: > I think there is an additional issue for transactions. Consider > a transfer between two accounts with the same security (USD). > > AcctDR CR > bank (USD) US

Re: Currencies / the accounting equation.

2000-09-29 Thread Dave Peticolas
writes: > More thoughts about the currency stuff. I think there are at least > two issues here which keep getting conflated, but it's hard to keep > them apart. Sorry about the rambly length. I'd appreciate any > thoughts. ... > Removing the Account's currency pointer. >