Nice one Derek :-)
Sorry Aaron, while I don't have a problem with you believing something
different to me, it is annoying to be subjected to your personal beliefs on
every email from you.
Regards,
Chris Good
> On 25 Oct 2014, at 3:00 am, gnucash-devel-requ...@gnucash.org wrote:
>
> Send gnuc
> On Oct 24, 2014, at 8:10 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> Christian Stimming writes:
>
>> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
>>> This works well because generally code that targets an older version of
>>> a dependency will usually still work when compiled against a newer
>>> version of that dependency. So
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> As for compiling boost from source, the question isn't whether they can,
> but whether they can make it co-exist with the distributions' version.
>
>
Just to be clear, if I'm understanding correctly, this is done by building
boost with ./b
Christian Stimming writes:
> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
>> This works well because generally code that targets an older version of
>> a dependency will usually still work when compiled against a newer
>> version of that dependency. So if we target version 1.48 of libFoo it
>> will generally still
Zitat von Derek Atkins :
This works well because generally code that targets an older version of
a dependency will usually still work when compiled against a newer
version of that dependency. So if we target version 1.48 of libFoo it
will generally still work with version 1.50 of libFoo that an
Hi,
Aaron Laws writes:
> I asked on IRC and was told that our targeted boost version is 1.48. There
> had been some minor dificulties with some of my commits recently because I
> was using boost 1.56, so I thought it would be best to use the officially
> targeted version. Now I'm using boost ver
