On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 07:31, Christian Neumair wrote:
> The attached patch aims to HIGify the welcome/new user dialog.
Committed.
David
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Derek Atkins schrieb:
> Yes, SuSE decided to build guppi inside the gnucash package. Don't
> ask me why. Ask them.
Presumably because GnuCash is the only application that uses guppi ...?
> > OK, I compiled this
> >>From source like I did in the old 1.6 days ... There was another problem
> > w
DAMMIT! I checked all the .scm files, but not additional stuff
that didn't have a .scm ending. Damn Damn Damn!
Thanks, let me fix this.
-derek
Herbert Thoma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Derek Atkins schrieb:
>> Yes, SuSE decided to build guppi inside the gnucash package. Don't
>> ask me why
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 09:15, Christian Neumair wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 23:57 -0700, David Hampton wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 07:31, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > > The attached patch aims to HIGify the welcome/new user dialog.
> >
> > What version of glade are you using to edit these f
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 10:00, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Benoit Grégoire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > release gnucash 2, it will have been out for over a year. I admit gnome 2.6
> > will be pushing it, but 2.4 (or later) is already part of FC1, Debian
> > testing, Mandrake 10, and Suse 9.1.
Debian
Herbert Thoma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just as a side note on this topic:
>
> I just installed SuSE 9.1 and tried to compile GnuCash (stable branch first).
> Almost all packages needed are included in the distribution, but they don't
> get installed by default. There is an installation option
Benoit Grégoire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 04 May 2004 01:00 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> No, 2.4 is NOT part of FC1:
>>
>> ls gtk2*
>> gtk2-2.2.4-5.1.i386.rpm
>> gtk2-devel-2.2.4-5.1.i386.rpm
>> gtk2-engines-2.2.0-3.i386.rpm
>
> Err, gtk2-2.2.4 IS part of gnome 2.4, gtk2-2.4.0 was onl
Just as a side note on this topic:
I just installed SuSE 9.1 and tried to compile GnuCash (stable branch first).
Almost all packages needed are included in the distribution, but they don't
get installed by default. There is an installation option for full gnome and
for developement, but apparently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 01:00 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> No, 2.4 is NOT part of FC1:
>
> ls gtk2*
> gtk2-2.2.4-5.1.i386.rpm
> gtk2-devel-2.2.4-5.1.i386.rpm
> gtk2-engines-2.2.0-3.i386.rpm
Err, gtk2-2.2.4 IS part of gnome 2.4, gtk2-2.4.0 was only just re
Benoit Grégoire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, gnome 2.4 has already been out for eight months now. By the time we
It's only been out about six months, and most distros are only NOW being
released with it
> release gnucash 2, it will have been out for over a year. I admit gnome 2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 11:09 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I'll repeat my statement again: We should LAG gnome releases by AT
> LEAST 6-9 months... Minimum. And indeed we should pick a "base
> distro" (I'd argue FC1 at this point) and make sure our code
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 23:57 -0700, David Hampton wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 07:31, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > The attached patch aims to HIGify the welcome/new user dialog.
>
> What version of glade are you using to edit these files? There are a
> bunch of properties there that my version o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
> Since neither debian nor fedora core have glade-2.4 in it, I think
> Christian could help us by providing instructions on how to get
> gnome-2.4/2.6 from source.
Since neither debian nor fedora core have glade-2.4 I would argue that
gnucash SHOULD NOT B
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:57:42PM -0700, David Hampton was heard to remark:
> On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 07:31, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > The attached patch aims to HIGify the welcome/new user dialog.
>
> What version of glade are you using to edit these files? There are a
> bunch of properties th
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 07:31, Christian Neumair wrote:
> The attached patch aims to HIGify the welcome/new user dialog.
What version of glade are you using to edit these files? There are a
bunch of properties there that my version of glade (2.0.1) doesn't know
about.
David
signature.asc
Descri
15 matches
Mail list logo
