Re: RFC: Move business-core objects (back) into engine, including their serialization

2010-04-21 Thread Thomas Troesch
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > Hi, > > Geert Janssens writes: > > > On Saturday 27 March 2010, Christian Stimming wrote: > >> For this reason I propose to move all code from business-core/ into > >> engine/, the code from business-core/xml/ into backend/xml, and from >

Re: RFC: Move business-core objects (back) into engine, including their serialization

2010-03-30 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Geert Janssens writes: > On Saturday 27 March 2010, Christian Stimming wrote: >> For this reason I propose to move all code from business-core/ into >> engine/, the code from business-core/xml/ into backend/xml, and from >> business-core/sql into backend/sql. This will get us back to the p

Re: RFC: Move business-core objects (back) into engine, including their serialization

2010-03-30 Thread Geert Janssens
On Saturday 27 March 2010, Christian Stimming wrote: > For this reason I propose to move all code from business-core/ into > engine/, the code from business-core/xml/ into backend/xml, and from > business-core/sql into backend/sql. This will get us back to the point > where each single level of

RFC: Move business-core objects (back) into engine, including their serialization

2010-03-27 Thread Christian Stimming
>From working with the cutecash experiment I found out several facts about the gnucash source code structure which I'd like to present and propose here as they appear. Today, I'd like to discuss the business-core directory: In gnucash, we have a bunch of "first-class objects" for the finance boo