Linas Vepstas wrote:
> Hi Koen,
>
> I got tired of all those complaints about XmeDrawShadows & and gnucash
> this & that, and decided to take the bull by the horns. And hit a wall;
> I need your help. Here's some background:
>
> 1) instaled the latest lesstiff RPM i could find, 0.87.1 (I'd prev
It's been rumoured that Koen D'Hondt said:
> The only way to build XmHTML without the Xme problems is to compile XmHTML
> using a 1.2.X Motif or a LessTif without the Motif 2.0 compatibility. All
> Motif 2.X libraries still have the _Xm functions available for backwards
> compatibility, so this sh
On 30-May-1999, Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you propose? Should I knock myself out anyway? Is there a
> well-known fix? How about some RPM spec files? I can build an RPM for
> XmHTML-1.1.7, maybe ...
You may want to take a look at the diff I made when packaging
XmHTML-1.1
Hi Linas,
> I got tired of all those complaints about XmeDrawShadows & and gnucash
> this & that, and decided to take the bull by the horns. And hit a wall;
> I need your help. Here's some background:
>
> 1) instaled the latest lesstiff RPM i could find, 0.87.1 (I'd previously
>used a comme
Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
> 3) No problem, sez I, I will download & compile xmHTML-1.1.7 myself. Whoops.
>NFW. xmkmf generates garbage, since the Imakefiles look for a "src" directory,
>which no longer exists. (its now lib/common, lib/motif, etc). So we'll use
>configure, say's I ...
