On 22 May 2014, at 07:26, Herbert Thoma wrote:
> Am 22.05.2014 16:11, schrieb Derek Atkins:
>> Clint Redwood writes:
>>
>>> Hi Derek,
>>>
>>> Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
>>> you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
>>
>> I have
Am 22.05.2014 16:11, schrieb Derek Atkins:
Clint Redwood writes:
Hi Derek,
Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
I have no idea what locale I would want. Most likely I'd have to use
en_UK becaus
Clint Redwood writes:
> Hi Derek,
>
> Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
> you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
I have no idea what locale I would want. Most likely I'd have to use
en_UK because, as you suggest, en_DE probably doesn'
On 22 May 2014, at 02:08, Clint Redwood wrote:
> Hi Derek,
>
>
> Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
> you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
It doesn't, and libc's setlocale() complains and sets the 'C' locale if you try
to use it
Hi Derek,
Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
You could set the tax jurisdition as a separate core option, or I guess you
could base it on the default report currency for the instance.
This
John Ralls writes:
>> The problem for doing it properly then was that tax reports are country
>> dependent but GnuCash doesn't have a country selection mechanism. But
>> GnuCash only works on the locale level, for example to list which
>> account hierarchies to offer when setting up a new book
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 14:22:19 John Ralls wrote:
> On May 20, 2014, at 12:57 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 May 2014 10:02:37 John Ralls wrote:
> >> On 20 May 2014, at 07:54, Geert Janssens
> >>
> >
> > wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:45:38 John Ralls wrote:
> On 19 May
On May 20, 2014, at 12:57 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 May 2014 10:02:37 John Ralls wrote:
>> On 20 May 2014, at 07:54, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:45:38 John Ralls wrote:
On 19 May 2014, at 23:37, Clint Redwood
> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 10:02:37 John Ralls wrote:
> On 20 May 2014, at 07:54, Geert Janssens
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:45:38 John Ralls wrote:
> >> On 19 May 2014, at 23:37, Clint Redwood
wrote:
> >>> Hi David,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the reply. I'd heard that before, and I didn't ex
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 19:54:02 Clint Redwood wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
>
> Thanks for your detailed reply. I've hacked the us report in order to
> do what I need in the short term, and will fix the localisations for
> it going forward. It seems that the whole process may not work quite
> as I'd hope
Hi Geert,
Thanks for your detailed reply. I've hacked the us report in order to do what I
need in the short term, and will fix the localisations for it going forward. It
seems that the whole process may not work quite as I'd hoped anyway, as I
suspect I need to be able to associate a single a
On 20 May 2014, at 07:54, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:45:38 John Ralls wrote:
>> On 19 May 2014, at 23:37, Clint Redwood wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply. I'd heard that before, and I didn't expect to
>>> be able to use the export, but the accompanying re
Clint,
Clint Redwood writes:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I'd heard that before, and I didn't expect to be
> able to use the export, but the accompanying report with the tax form
> lines accumulating related accounts, rather than having to use a
> spreadsheet each year and remember whic
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:45:38 John Ralls wrote:
> On 19 May 2014, at 23:37, Clint Redwood wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply. I'd heard that before, and I didn't expect to
> > be able to use the export, but the accompanying report with the tax
> > form lines accumulating related
On 19 May 2014, at 23:37, Clint Redwood wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I'd heard that before, and I didn't expect to be able
> to use the export, but the accompanying report with the tax form lines
> accumulating related accounts, rather than having to use a spreadsheet each
>
Hi David,
Thanks for the reply. I'd heard that before, and I didn't expect to be able to
use the export, but the accompanying report with the tax form lines
accumulating related accounts, rather than having to use a spreadsheet each
year and remember which accounts added up to what.
There is c
Clint,
That is not a stupid question. The txf format was developed by Intuit for users
of its financial and tax prep software in the U.S. Intuit’s specs for the
format make it clear (by omission) that the format as defined is really just
for U.S. tax purposes.
GnuCash’s TXF options have been m
17 matches
Mail list logo
