RE: Building GnuCash on 64-bit failed

2005-11-26 Thread David Hampton
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 12:10 -0500, Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) wrote: > > Okay, this should now be fixed.. Can you "svn update" > > your goffice-update branch and re-try? > > > I did that. Now I am getting the same error that I reported originally > with the trunk: > > cc1: warnings being trea

Re: Building GnuCash on 64-bit failed

2005-11-25 Thread Derek Atkins
Okay, this should now be fixed.. Can you "svn update" your goffice-update branch and re-try? -derek Volker Englisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The goffice-update branch fails as well but at a different location in > the process. However, it appears that this branch fails far later in > th

RE: Building GnuCash on 64-bit failed

2005-11-25 Thread Englisch, Volker \(NIH/NCI\)
> Okay, this should now be fixed.. Can you "svn update" > your goffice-update branch and re-try? I did that. Now I am getting the same error that I reported originally with the trunk: cc1: warnings being treated as errors gog-graph.c: In function 'gog_graph_ref_data': gog-graph.c:414: warning

Re: Building GnuCash on 64-bit failed

2005-11-25 Thread Derek Atkins
Interesting. I just tried this branch on FC3 and it fails for me in exactly the same way. It has to do with Neil's changes to move goffice-config.h to the top-level directory. Unfortunately that doesn't work properly, because all the goffice code is looking for goffice/goffice-config.h (which ob

Re: Building GnuCash on 64-bit failed

2005-11-24 Thread Volker Englisch
The goffice-update branch fails as well but at a different location in the process. However, it appears that this branch fails far later in the compilation process. But then again, I really don't know if the branches are comparable. go-marshalers.c:2:36: error: goffice/goffice-config.h: No s

Re: Building GnuCash on 64-bit failed

2005-11-24 Thread Derek Atkins
Just for kicks, can you try the goffice-update branch? I mean, there's clearly some 64-bit issues in the GOG code, but I think Josh plans to merge the updated goffice code back into the trunk, in which case it doesn't make sense to try to fix the bugs in the current code. -derek Quoting Volker E

Re: Building GnuCash on 64-bit failed

2005-11-24 Thread Volker Englisch
On 11/24/2005 10:07 AM Derek Atkins wrote: Is this SVN trunk or the branches/goffice-update ? -derek It is SVN trunk. Volker Volker Englisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all and Happy Thanksgiving! > > I was busy the last few weeks setting up my new machine but I'm up and

Re: Building GnuCash on 64-bit failed

2005-11-24 Thread Derek Atkins
Is this SVN trunk or the branches/goffice-update ? -derek Volker Englisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all and Happy Thanksgiving! > > I was busy the last few weeks setting up my new machine but I'm up and > running again and will soon be able to do some more testing. > > My machine is an A