On Friday 09 December 2005 5:20 am, Volker Englisch wrote:
> I build g-wrap 1.9.6 on my 64-bit system but I was wondering if I need
> to do anything special for the 'make install' step. I'm afraid the
> library might get installed in /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64 or is this
> all handled by the c
Volker Englisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/07/2005 12:14 PM Derek Atkins wrote:
>> No. Neil is providing the Debian package name, not the library name.
>> The "problem" you will find is that you get g-wrap 1.3.4 but you probably
>> also have gcc-4.0.. This is a "bad" combination in that
On 12/07/2005 12:14 PM Derek Atkins wrote:
No. Neil is providing the Debian package name, not the library name.
The "problem" you will find is that you get g-wrap 1.3.4 but you probably
also have gcc-4.0.. This is a "bad" combination in that g-wrap 1.3.4
outputs semi-broken code. You can still
Derek Atkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Bill,
>
> Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /opt/gnucash/bin/gnucash
> >> > ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link:
> >> > ERROR: file: "libgw-wct", message: "/usr/lib/libgw-wct.so.0: cannot
> >> > open
> >> > sh
Bill,
Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /opt/gnucash/bin/gnucash
>> > ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link:
>> > ERROR: file: "libgw-wct", message: "/usr/lib/libgw-wct.so.0: cannot
>> > open
>> > shared object file: No such file or directory"
>
> It's look
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 11:15 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> Ah, hmm. I probably should have built with all options... I'll see
> what I can do later.
Fixed. Thanks for the heads up.
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Sorry, I was looking for gwrap instead of g-wrap. Those _are_ on my
systems as version 1.3.4 as Derek already said.
I will install g-wrap 1.9.6 and then report back once I'm done.
Thanks for your help
Volker
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
g
Christian Stimming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 17:26 schrieb Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]:
> > > I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my 64-bit system
> >
> > Just noticed that even though I can compile GC (without the
> > --enable-hbci
> > option) I can not run
Quoting Volker Englisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am running Fedora Core 4
FC4 has g-wrap-devel-1.3.4
What version of these libraries:
libgwrap-runtime0-dev
libgwrapguile-dev
I don't have either of these on my 64-bit system but I also don't
have these on my other system (32-bit, FC4) where G
Quoting Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 17:26 schrieb Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]:
> I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my 64-bit system
Just noticed that even though I can compile GC (without the
--enable-hbci
option) I can not run it:
[EMAIL
on 12/7/2005 11:46 AM Neil Williams said the following:
That could be an outdated gwrap package. What distribution are you running on
this 64bit machine?
I am running Fedora Core 4
What version of these libraries:
libgwrap-runtime0-dev
libgwrapguile-dev
I don't have either of these on m
Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 17:26 schrieb Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]:
> > I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my 64-bit system
>
> Just noticed that even though I can compile GC (without the
> --enable-hbci
> option) I can not run it:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /opt/gnucash/bin/gnucash
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 4:26 pm, Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
> > I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my 64-bit system
>
> Just noticed that even though I can compile GC (without the
> --enable-hbci
> option) I can not run it:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /opt/gnucash/bin/gnucash
> I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my 64-bit system
Just noticed that even though I can compile GC (without the
--enable-hbci
option) I can not run it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /opt/gnucash/bin/gnucash
ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link:
ERROR: file: "libgw-wct", message: "/usr/lib/libgw
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 11:05 -0500, Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
> > I took Karl up on this offer, and David Hampton and I were able to
> > squish the happily-small number of 64-bit compilation issues. If you
> > see others, please speak up.
>
> I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my
> I took Karl up on this offer, and David Hampton and I were able to
> squish the happily-small number of 64-bit compilation issues. If you
> see others, please speak up.
I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my 64-bit system but only
when I drop the --enable-hbci option. With it the compila
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 23:19 -0800, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 11:55 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> > Thanks to the efforts of Neil and Derek, the goffice-update branch is
> > pretty robust at this point, except for issues on 64-bit platforms.
> > However, since I understand those issue
17 matches
Mail list logo
