Re: tarball POTFILE.in errors; 1.9.0 next Sunday proposed (was: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today)

2006-02-01 Thread Chris Lyttle
OK We are good on amd64 now; === gnucash-1.9.0 archives ready for distribution: gnucash-1.9.0.tar.gz === I expect it will be the same on my stable x86 box too. I'll keep testing builds during the week to make s

Re: tarball POTFILE.in errors; 1.9.0 next Sunday proposed (was: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today)

2006-02-01 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 09:37:20AM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > What about: >#4. Any source file we version control but don't distribute, we > also don't want to translate. According to intltool-update, those > files should be listed in POTFILES.skip. This makes the --maintain > mode of i

Re: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today

2006-02-01 Thread Derek Atkins
Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK I managed to get past the tex problem. Was a bug in the 3.0 version, > downgrading fixed it. I'm still unable to get a compile to work tho; > > on amd64 I get, > > qif loading > "../../../../../src/import-export/qif/test/test-files/test-1-bank-txn.qif"

Re: tarball POTFILE.in errors; 1.9.0 next Sunday proposed (was: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today)

2006-02-01 Thread Tim Wunder
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 4:56 am, someone claiming to be Christian Stimming wrote: > Ok, > > there are obviously still build problems in a tarball. I propose to plan > for a 1.9.0 next Sunday. Until then, everyone should at least once do a > "make dist" and try to compile the resulting tarbal

RE: tarball POTFILE.in errors; 1.9.0 next Sunday proposed (was: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today)

2006-02-01 Thread Englisch, Volker \(NIH/NCI\) [C]
> Does anyone of the active developers have a amd64 machine at hand? (I > don't.) I would certainly believe that some tests will fail on amd64 as > long as this is none of our actively developed target platforms... I'm not an active developer but I do have an AMD64 running FC4 sitting at home.

Re: tarball POTFILE.in errors; 1.9.0 next Sunday proposed (was: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today)

2006-02-01 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:56:24AM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > > > >make[3]: Entering directory > >`/home/chris/cvs/gnucash-test/gnucash-1.9.0/_build/po' > >INTLTOOL_EXTRACT=../intltool-extract srcdir=../../po ../intltool-update > >--gettext-package gnucash --pot > >can't > >open > >../../p

Re: tarball POTFILE.in errors; 1.9.0 next Sunday proposed (was: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today)

2006-02-01 Thread Christian Stimming
Ok, there are obviously still build problems in a tarball. I propose to plan for a 1.9.0 next Sunday. Until then, everyone should at least once do a "make dist" and try to compile the resulting tarball from the tarball alone. Chris Lyttle schrieb: on amd64 I get, Does anyone of the active

Re: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today

2006-01-31 Thread Chris Lyttle
OK I managed to get past the tex problem. Was a bug in the 3.0 version, downgrading fixed it. I'm still unable to get a compile to work tho; on amd64 I get, qif loading "../../../../../src/import-export/qif/test/test-files/test-1-bank-txn.qif"... *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (

Re: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today

2006-01-30 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi Chris, Chris Lyttle schrieb: make[4]: Entering directory `/home/chris/cvs/gnucash-test/gnucash-1.9.0/_build/src/doc/design' TEXINPUTS="../../../../src/doc/design:$TEXINPUTS" \ MAKEINFO='/bin/sh /home/chris/cvs/gnucash-test/gnucash-1.9.0/missing --run makeinfo -I ../../../../src/doc/design'

Re: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today

2006-01-29 Thread Chris Lyttle
OK and I dont seem to be able to get distcheck to work. It compiles ok initially, just when it gets into the distcheck part it dies. Guess we'll have to hold that thought about a release today! Chris Making dvi in design make[4]: Entering directory `/home/chris/cvs/gnucash-test/gnucash-1.9.0/_bu

Re: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today

2006-01-29 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Ok, as now the bugs in bugzilla according to http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Release_Schedule don't seem to cause any immediate crash and/or immediate data loss, I would actually propose to GO FOR IT! Let's have a 1.9.0 today! Yeah! :-) Actually, 32

Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today

2006-01-29 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi Chris and all, Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 03:31 schrieb Chris Lyttle: > > almost two weeks ago I proposed a release schedule for the upcoming > > unstable 1.9.x release series. > > I can handle that release schedule as release engineer. Good to hear! Thanks a lot. > As I'm familiar with th