On maandag 21 maart 2011, Stephen Brown wrote:
> Hi Derek, Geert & Christian
> At the moment I am successfully building under Microsoft Vista whatever the
> install.sh build scripts build,
> which If I understand
> what is being said in this thread correctly is the stable version. I want
> to devel
On maandag 21 maart 2011, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Geert Janssens writes:
> > Yay !
> >
> > I'm a bit busy right now, but later this week I'll push some of the
> > developments I have been working on (guile 1.8, gnome-druid
> > replacement,...).
>
> A couple to-dos:
>
> 1) Make the 2.4 branch win3
Hi Derek, Geert & Christian
At the moment I am successfully building under Microsoft Vista whatever the
install.sh build scripts build,
which If I understand
what is being said in this thread correctly is the stable version. I want to
develope on the developement version.
Yours Sincerely Stephe
Geert Janssens writes:
> Yay !
>
> I'm a bit busy right now, but later this week I'll push some of the
> developments I have been working on (guile 1.8, gnome-druid replacement,...).
A couple to-dos:
1) Make the 2.4 branch win32 build scripts build from the 2.4 branch
instead of trunk.
2)
On zondag 20 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> > On zaterdag 12 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > > Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> > > > > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can
> > > > > >
On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens:
>> On zaterdag 12 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens:
>> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can
>> introd
Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> On zaterdag 12 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> > > > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can
> > > > > introduce several pending changes on trunk without risking t
On zaterdag 12 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> > > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
> > > > several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable
> > > > code state we have in 2.4.3.
>
Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
> > > several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable
> > > code state we have in 2.4.3.
>
> Since you proposed the branching and most people agreed, I
On Mar 12, 2011, at 1:56 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On maandag 7 maart 2011, John Ralls wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
>>> Dear developers,
>>>
>>> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
>>> several pending changes on trunk without
On maandag 7 maart 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > Dear developers,
> >
> > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
> > several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable
> > code state we have in 2
Christian Stimming writes:
> Am Montag, 7. März 2011 schrieb Derek Atkins:
>> >> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
>> >> several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable
>> >> code state we have in 2.4.3.
>> >>
>> >
>> > No comments, just
Am Montag, 7. März 2011 schrieb Derek Atkins:
> >> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
> >> several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable
> >> code state we have in 2.4.3.
> >>
> >
> > No comments, just a +1 from me.
>
> I'm fine with it.
On Mar 7, 2011, at 6:43 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
>
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
>> several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable code
>> state we h
On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce several
> pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable code state we
> have in 2.4.3.
>
> Pending changes for trunk are:
> - Requi
Geert Janssens writes:
> On maandag 7 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
>> several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable
>> code state we have in 2.4.3.
>>
>> Pending chang
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:53:55 +0100
Christian Stimming wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can
> introduce several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose
> the stable code state we have in 2.4.3.
>
> Pending changes for trunk are:
> -
On maandag 7 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
> several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable
> code state we have in 2.4.3.
>
> Pending changes for trunk are:
> - Requiring gu
Dear developers,
I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce
several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable
code state we have in 2.4.3.
Pending changes for trunk are:
- Requiring guile-1.8 (i.e. throwing out guile-1.6 support)
- Requiring gtk
19 matches
Mail list logo
