Thanks, it appears to be working now (or, at least, it builds ;)
-derek
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Derek Atkins writes:
> > Well, with those couple of changes, it appears to be working for me
> > with the libxml-1.8.6 (which is shipped with RH 6.2). Are we not
> > going to su
Derek Atkins writes:
> Well, with those couple of changes, it appears to be working for me
> with the libxml-1.8.6 (which is shipped with RH 6.2). Are we not
> going to support RH 6.2 in the development version?
>
> I certainly have no qualms about requiring a rebuild between the two
> versions
Well, with those couple of changes, it appears to be working for me
with the libxml-1.8.6 (which is shipped with RH 6.2). Are we not
going to support RH 6.2 in the development version?
I certainly have no qualms about requiring a rebuild between the two
versions of libxml, but it would be a sham
Derek Atkins writes:
> Hi,
>
> I needed the following patch to get the CVS mainline to compile
> on RH6.2 using libxml-devel-1.8.6-2. The problem is the apparent
> lack of an xmlRootNode member of the xmlDocPtr object. At least
> in version 1.8.6, that structure member is called 'root', not
> '
Hi,
I needed the following patch to get the CVS mainline to compile
on RH6.2 using libxml-devel-1.8.6-2. The problem is the apparent
lack of an xmlRootNode member of the xmlDocPtr object. At least
in version 1.8.6, that structure member is called 'root', not
'xmlRootNode'.
-derek
Index: src/e
