Chris Shoemaker schrieb:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:28:36PM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
IIRC there has been some talk about automating this task already; that's
even better.
I started to script this, but ended up spending all the time getting
'make dist' to work (which it did last time
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:28:36PM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
> IIRC there has been some talk about automating this task already; that's
> even better.
Yeah,
I started to script this, but ended up spending all the time getting
'make dist' to work (which it did last time I checked) and ha
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 13:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This, to me, indicates that it is a test/bugfix build only. 1.9.0 looks
> > more
> > like a normal release.
> Lots of packages (linux, lilypond, etc) hold to the convention that an
> odd
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This, to me, indicates that it is a test/bugfix build only. 1.9.0 looks more
> like a normal release.
Lots of packages (linux, lilypond, etc) hold to the convention that an
odd chain of releases is the development/testing line, and the even
ones are no
Dear developers,
just to bring up this issue again in a more formal way: We are now clearly
heading towards a release cycle of gnucash with gnome2.
The old gnucash-1.8.x release series might have one last gnucash-1.8.12
release which contains only bugfixes, but doesn't introduce new features o
On Sunday 16 October 2005 9:28 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Additionally, I propose that we should start as soon as possible with
> pre-releases of the upcoming gnucash-2.0.0, which can still be in a quite
> buggy state. I propose that we make an extra release cycle from these,
> starting from "
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:28 +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Thoughts? Comments?
This all sounds right and good.
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@
