Re: New Scheme string routines

2008-06-05 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Maybe create a new file in src/scm and then you can cause >> it to get loaded by main.scm? I don't think main.scm >> is the right place for these procedures. >> > > OK. Should I

Re: New Scheme string routines

2008-06-05 Thread Charles Day
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe create a new file in src/scm and then you can cause > it to get loaded by main.scm? I don't think main.scm > is the right place for these procedures. > OK. Should I be naming these procedures with "gnc-" in front to

Re: New Scheme string routines

2008-06-05 Thread Derek Atkins
Maybe create a new file in src/scm and then you can cause it to get loaded by main.scm? I don't think main.scm is the right place for these procedures. -derek Quoting Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > To support multi-byte account separators in the QIF importer I have had to > write several ne

New Scheme string routines

2008-06-05 Thread Charles Day
To support multi-byte account separators in the QIF importer I have had to write several new Scheme string manipulation routines. They are pretty useful variations on some of the standard routines. I have them working in the QIF importer, but is there a better place to stick them so that they can b