Re: NEEDINFO about NEEDINFO

2006-04-14 Thread Derek Atkins
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I just include "NEEDINFO" in my saved queries.. I have two saved >> queries, "My GnuCash Bugs" and "All GnuCash Bugs".. And NEEDINFO is >> included in both of them, so I always see them. > > Interesting. So, for you, NEEDINFO doesn't even imply "do

Re: NEEDINFO about NEEDINFO

2006-04-13 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:42:24PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I browse through the gnucash bugs, the NEEDINFO ones are listed for me as > >> well.) > > > > True. I also use a "needinfo" saved report. Browsing that for a few > > weeks is actua

Re: NEEDINFO about NEEDINFO

2006-04-13 Thread Derek Atkins
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I browse through the gnucash bugs, the NEEDINFO ones are listed for me as >> well.) > > True. I also use a "needinfo" saved report. Browsing that for a few > weeks is actually what prompted my email. I just include "NEEDINFO" in my saved queries..

Re: NEEDINFO about NEEDINFO

2006-04-13 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:41:26AM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote: > Hi, > > (FYI: I'm out of town and away from emails until next week, April 18th) > > Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2006 17:35 schrieb Chris Shoemaker: > > One problem I have with the current use is that it doesn't > > seem to w

Re: NEEDINFO about NEEDINFO

2006-04-13 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi, (FYI: I'm out of town and away from emails until next week, April 18th) Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2006 17:35 schrieb Chris Shoemaker: > One problem I have with the current use is that it doesn't > seem to work well with bugzilla's default reports. Bugzilla treats > NEEDINFO as "on ice",

Re: NEEDINFO about NEEDINFO

2006-04-12 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 03:30:45PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 3a) The implication is that bugs currently marked NEEDINFO need to > > be re-evaluated for usefulness and that the bar for closing them is > > not necessarily any lower than for UNCO

Re: NEEDINFO about NEEDINFO

2006-04-12 Thread Derek Atkins
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 3a) The implication is that bugs currently marked NEEDINFO need to > be re-evaluated for usefulness and that the bar for closing them is > not necessarily any lower than for UNCONFIRMED bugs. But, in the > future, NEEDINFO would mean that the bug ha

NEEDINFO about NEEDINFO

2006-04-12 Thread Chris Shoemaker
Developers, I'd like to suggest that we agree upon a common use of the NEEDINFO flag in bugzilla. ISTM (correct me if I'm wrong, please) that Christian's (not to single out Christian, but he's the main bug-processor) current common practice is to respond to new bug reports with requests f