On 03-12-12 15:22, John Ralls wrote:
AFAICT git-svn doesn't work on a bare repo. You'll have to clone the Github repos and run
git-svn-mirror on those clones after adjusting the config file to look like the one in
the wiki page [1]. Set the "origin" remote to point to the gitolite bare repo.
G
On Nov 28, 2012, at 6:10 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Geert Janssens writes:
>
>> On 27-11-12 15:06, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>> John Ralls writes:
>>>
OK. Sounds like you've got the next action item, get the email hook
set up. After that, you can install git-svn-mirror from Github and
>>
Geert Janssens writes:
> On 27-11-12 15:06, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> John Ralls writes:
>>
>>> OK. Sounds like you've got the next action item, get the email hook
>>> set up. After that, you can install git-svn-mirror from Github and
>>> work out how to trigger it from svn. I think you can clone t
On Nov 27, 2012, at 11:06 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> A bare git repo is one that has no working files and puts all of the
>> git state files in the main directory instead of in a .git
>> directory. You can't commit to it, or checkout branches, but you can
>> do just abou
On 27-11-12 15:06, Derek Atkins wrote:
John Ralls writes:
OK. Sounds like you've got the next action item, get the email hook
set up. After that, you can install git-svn-mirror from Github and
work out how to trigger it from svn. I think you can clone the Github
repos to save some time (it tak
John Ralls writes:
> OK. Sounds like you've got the next action item, get the email hook
> set up. After that, you can install git-svn-mirror from Github and
> work out how to trigger it from svn. I think you can clone the Github
> repos to save some time (it takes several hours to make a fresh
>
On Nov 27, 2012, at 4:03 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> On Nov 25, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Geert Janssens
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So you basically propose to get jeeves out the the equation first and only
>>> then go into the website migration. That's fine with me as well.
>
Hi,
John Ralls writes:
> On Nov 25, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>
>> So you basically propose to get jeeves out the the equation first and only
>> then go into the website migration. That's fine with me as well.
>>
>> Since gitolite will be installed on the same server that hosts
On Nov 25, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> So you basically propose to get jeeves out the the equation first and only
> then go into the website migration. That's fine with me as well.
>
> Since gitolite will be installed on the same server that hosts the svn repos
> (code.gnucash.o
On 25-11-12 12:28, John Ralls wrote:
On Nov 25, 2012, at 8:00 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
This morning I have been thinking out loud on irc on the best way to migrate
our website infrastructure from svn to github. This is part of the overall
effort to move all GnuCash svn dependent activities
On Nov 25, 2012, at 8:00 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> This morning I have been thinking out loud on irc on the best way to migrate
> our website infrastructure from svn to github. This is part of the overall
> effort to move all GnuCash svn dependent activities to git.
>
> Short background on
This morning I have been thinking out loud on irc on the best way to
migrate our website infrastructure from svn to github. This is part of
the overall effort to move all GnuCash svn dependent activities to git.
Short background on our website's relation to svn
- The website is maintained in an
12 matches
Mail list logo
