> On Dec 30, 2015, at 6:45 PM, Emily Zora wrote:
>
> OK. I have more to think about. Making lots identifiable would mean you could
> have splits from multiple accounts assigned to one lot.
> I noticed too that in the current scrub implementation, say you buy 100 and
> then sell 50, you end up
OK. I have more to think about. Making lots identifiable would mean you
could have splits from multiple accounts assigned to one lot.
I noticed too that in the current scrub implementation, say you buy 100 and
then sell 50, you end up with two lots (lot 0: 50 closed, lot 1: 50 open)
instead of one
> On Dec 30, 2015, at 1:55 AM, Emily Zora wrote:
>
> Hi all. I've been working a lot with bitcoin lately and I've noticed some
> deficiencies in the way lots and capital gains are handled, particularly
> when multiple wallets (accounts) are involved. From my googling, this
> appears to be an ack
Hi all. I've been working a lot with bitcoin lately and I've noticed some
deficiencies in the way lots and capital gains are handled, particularly
when multiple wallets (accounts) are involved. From my googling, this
appears to be an acknowledged problem. Before taking a stab at trying to
fix, I wa
