Re: Log File behaviour

2000-06-19 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 07:41:29PM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > > > > Now, those .xac files - are they the previous data file, or are > > > > > they written in parallel with the main file? (Or co

Re: Log File behaviour

2000-06-19 Thread Hendrik Boom
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 07:41:29PM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > > > > > Now, those .xac files - are they the previous data file, or are they > > > > written in parallel with the main file? (Or copied after the main file > > > > is written?

Re: Log File behaviour

2000-06-17 Thread Dylan Paul Thurston
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 07:41:29PM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > > > Now, those .xac files - are they the previous data file, or are they > > > written in parallel with the main file? (Or copied after the main file > > > is written?) > > > > Th

Re: Log File behaviour

2000-06-16 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > Richard Wackerbarth writes: > > I could recommend another strategy :-) > > Yes, we might want to think about just copying the original to > the backup file, rather than making a trail of 'save histories'. You can have both by having a trail of backup

Re: Log File behaviour

2000-06-16 Thread Dave Peticolas
Richard Wackerbarth writes: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > Richard Wackerbarth writes: > > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > > > > Now, those .xac files - are they the previous data file, or are they > > > > > written in parallel with the main file? (Or copied afte

Re: Log File behaviour

2000-06-16 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > Richard Wackerbarth writes: > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > > > Now, those .xac files - are they the previous data file, or are they > > > > written in parallel with the main file? (Or copied after the main > > > > file is written?) >

Re: Log File behaviour

2000-06-15 Thread Dave Peticolas
Richard Wackerbarth writes: > On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > > > Now, those .xac files - are they the previous data file, or are they > > > written in parallel with the main file? (Or copied after the main file > > > is written?) > > > > They are written immediately after the main

Re: Log File behaviour

2000-06-15 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > Now, those .xac files - are they the previous data file, or are they > > written in parallel with the main file? (Or copied after the main file > > is written?) > > They are written immediately after the main file is written. So, if I have (only) a

Re: Log File behaviour

2000-06-15 Thread Dave Peticolas
Ben Stanley writes: > Hi, > > I'm looking to replicate my stability problems in 1.3.99, so I'm looking > over my log files to try to come up with a duplicate account set. > > I've got the following files: > > MyMoney.gnucash.2609091831.xac > MyMoney.gnucash.2611151831.log <- Opened up f

Log File behaviour

2000-06-15 Thread Ben Stanley
Hi, I'm looking to replicate my stability problems in 1.3.99, so I'm looking over my log files to try to come up with a duplicate account set. I've got the following files: MyMoney.gnucash.2609091831.xac MyMoney.gnucash.2611151831.log <- Opened up for a peek - no changes MyMoney.gnucash