On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:08:33PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >The plugins, pluginpages and pluginmanager all end up depending on
> >these. Although, at the moment I can't remember the exact dependency
> >chain, so I'm going to start-over and try to take better notes.
>
> I'd like to see the de
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:08:33PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>I see no instance of "gnc_show_splash_screen" in gnucash-bin.c in any
> >>form.. So when you moved stuff around you removed my comment completely.
> >
> >It's the first thing that ha
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I see no instance of "gnc_show_splash_screen" in gnucash-bin.c in any
form.. So when you moved stuff around you removed my comment completely.
It's the first thing that happens inside gnc_main_gui_init(). When
that was called before loading module
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 06:22:21PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 05:58:01PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >>FWIW, I still want to see enough of gnome initialized earlier such
> >>that the splash screen can get instantiated ear
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 05:58:01PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
FWIW, I still want to see enough of gnome initialized earlier such
that the splash screen can get instantiated earlier. You removed my
gnucash-bin.c comment about "start the splash screen
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 05:58:01PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> FWIW, I still want to see enough of gnome initialized earlier such
> that the splash screen can get instantiated earlier. You removed my
> gnucash-bin.c comment about "start the splash screen here" in your
> recent set of commits...
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 03:53:13PM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 14:58 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> > I'm going to see how painful it is to move gnc-main-window and its
> > dependencies (e.g. gnc-plugin-manager) from gnome-utils into gnome.
>
> Have fun. :-) Some of t
David Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 14:58 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
>> I'm going to see how painful it is to move gnc-main-window and its
>> dependencies (e.g. gnc-plugin-manager) from gnome-utils into gnome.
>
> Have fun. :-) Some of that code originally move
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 14:58 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> I'm going to see how painful it is to move gnc-main-window and its
> dependencies (e.g. gnc-plugin-manager) from gnome-utils into gnome.
Have fun. :-) Some of that code originally moved from gnome to
gnome-utils because of compile time
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:38:06PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2) This could be a straight combination or a reshuffling along a
> > different boundary.
>
> > Any thoughts?
>
> Umm... I would say B, if that works. You MAY need to separate out
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, the fact that you can just depend on all your
> libraries being loaded by guile so that you can just say
> scm_c_eval_string("blah") anytime and anywhere, even if it ends up
> using a symbol in some library that's not in your LIBADD, is _bad_.
>
Aarrg!
The shutdown() function in gnucash-bin.c clearly doesn't belong
there. It's a C-implementation of the function that was getting
called from gnome-utils/gnc-gnome-utils.c:gnc_shutdown(). So, the
most obvious thing to do is replace gnc_shutdown() with it's
C-implementation.
But, of cou
Am Samstag, 21. Januar 2006 02:01 schrieb Chris Shoemaker:
> > > > Ok, I think I've talked myself into this conclusion: Any application
> > > > initialization state that gets pulled from guile and used everywhere
> > > > else shouldn't be kept in gnucash-bin. Instead, gnucash-bin can call
> > > >
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:38:13PM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 18:24 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Ok, I think I've talked myself into this conclusion: Any application
> > > initialization state that gets pulled from g
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 18:24 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Ok, I think I've talked myself into this conclusion: Any application
> > initialization state that gets pulled from guile and used everywhere
> > else shouldn't be kept in gnucash-bin. Inst
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ok, I think I've talked myself into this conclusion: Any application
initialization state that gets pulled from guile and used everywhere
else shouldn't be kept in gnucash-bin. Instead, gnucash-bin can call
into libcore-utils and it can be stored the
[ In the process of writing this (rather LONG) email asking for
advice, I think I've discovered an answer, but I'm sending anyway in
case it generates some discussion. ]
Sorry I couldn't think of a better Subject: but I'm having a mental
block on large-scale program structure.
I'll illustrate my
17 matches
Mail list logo
