On vrijdag 11 november 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Zitat von Geert Janssens :
> > Hmm, good point. So far there are no changes yet that require 2.24
> > as far as I
> > know. But we'll see what turns up when the DISABLE_DEPRECATED defines are
> > used.
> >
> > Shouldn't we change configure.a
Zitat von Geert Janssens :
Hmm, good point. So far there are no changes yet that require 2.24
as far as I
know. But we'll see what turns up when the DISABLE_DEPRECATED defines are
used.
Shouldn't we change configure.ac already to require 2.18 ? There is a comment
in there that this is currentl
On vrijdag 11 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > On donderdag 10 november 2011, Mike Evans wrote:
> >> I just compiled and ran the latest SVN and I now have no invoice windows
> >> just the status bar. This appears to be due the gtk+ requireme
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On donderdag 10 november 2011, Mike Evans wrote:
>> I just compiled and ran the latest SVN and I now have no invoice windows
>> just the status bar. This appears to be due the gtk+ requirement being
>> 2.24. The current gtk+ on my, regularly
On donderdag 10 november 2011, Mike Evans wrote:
> I just compiled and ran the latest SVN and I now have no invoice windows
> just the status bar. This appears to be due the gtk+ requirement being
> 2.24. The current gtk+ on my, regularly yum updated, Fedora 14 is 2.22.
> Changing requirement in
I just compiled and ran the latest SVN and I now have no invoice windows
just the status bar. This appears to be due the gtk+ requirement being
2.24. The current gtk+ on my, regularly yum updated, Fedora 14 is 2.22.
Changing requirement in the glade file restores the page.
Could Geert downgrade
