Re: Difficulty building on MacOSX (Mike Alexander)

org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of gnucash-devel digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Difficulty building on MacOSX (Mike Alexander) >> >> >> -

Re: Difficulty building on MacOSX (Mike Alexander)

You can reach the person managing the list at > gnucash-devel-ow...@gnucash.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of gnucash-devel digest..." > > > Today&#x

Re: Difficulty building on MacOSX

> On May 7, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Mike Alexander wrote: > > --On May 7, 2015 at 7:19:49 AM -0700 John Ralls wrote: > >> Surely you didn’t rebuild libc just to get a 64-bit time_t. What >> motivated you? Since you went to the work of replacing libc and the >> headers in your SDK (and have to redo i

Re: Difficulty building on MacOSX

--On May 7, 2015 at 7:19:49 AM -0700 John Ralls wrote: Surely you didn’t rebuild libc just to get a 64-bit time_t. What motivated you? Since you went to the work of replacing libc and the headers in your SDK (and have to redo it every time Apple pushes an Xcode upgrade), why not upgrade your T

Re: Difficulty building on MacOSX

> On May 7, 2015, at 12:27 AM, Mike Alexander wrote: > > --On May 5, 2015 at 6:18:09 PM -0700 John Ralls wrote: > >> I obviously haven’t encountered that problem, and ISTM our >> environments for this purpose should be pretty much identical, at >> least when you’re using the Xcode compiler. Th

Re: Difficulty building on MacOSX

--On May 5, 2015 at 6:18:09 PM -0700 John Ralls wrote: I obviously haven’t encountered that problem, and ISTM our environments for this purpose should be pretty much identical, at least when you’re using the Xcode compiler. The one possibility that comes to mind is optimization: I’m building w

Re: Difficulty building on MacOSX

--On May 5, 2015 at 6:18:09 PM -0700 John Ralls wrote: I obviously haven’t encountered that problem, and ISTM our environments for this purpose should be pretty much identical, at least when you’re using the Xcode compiler. The one possibility that comes to mind is optimization: I’m building w

Re: Difficulty building on MacOSX

> On May 5, 2015, at 5:08 PM, Mike Alexander wrote: > > I'm having trouble building the X window version of Gnucash with the recent > changes to use Boost for data and time on MacOSX 10.10.3 with XCode 6.3.1. > I've tried using both clang as provided by XCode and GCC 4.8 as provided by > Mac

Difficulty building on MacOSX

I'm having trouble building the X window version of Gnucash with the recent changes to use Boost for data and time on MacOSX 10.10.3 with XCode 6.3.1. I've tried using both clang as provided by XCode and GCC 4.8 as provided by MacPorts and get similar failures. In each case either the first o