I have just read Paul Lussier's post of the 18 june 2001 Re: gnucash
dependencies criticized.
(I am never sure which way to read my posts. Do I start with the latest and
work back or do I start with the earlest and work forward?)
And I will now sit down in my corner as the comment I haven't mad
Rob Walker wrote:
> cbbrowne> Both options provide a nice big "blech!"
>
> yes, it sucks, but the users are then able to run gnucash. It may be
> 75 to 100 Megs of sucks, but it seems like gnucash needs that many
> megs of libraries and whatnot.
May I make a comment with my tongue stuck so fir
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:18:01 -0500 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
cbbrowne> a) Having to have libs installed in some GnuCash-specific
cbbrowne> place, so that there might be several copies of the _same_
cbbrowne> GNOME libs if one had GnuCash as well as RHAT as well as
cbbrowne> Ximi
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Rob> What about a downloadable .tar.gz file which is all n Megs of
> Rob> libraries and gnucash and whatnot, and the user is told to "cd ~ &&
> Rob> tar -zxvf ". That would create a ~/gnucash-app directory...
>
> Using a .tar.gz file makes it easier for developers/packager
