Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, Thomas. For reference, where can I find out which arch's can
> and can't support GnuCash? I thought Debian ran on lots of strange
> archs that I'd never heard of running GnuCash. Are all these
> considered "current?" :
>
> [alpha] [amd64] [a
Hi Chris,
Just checkout debian package page:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/gnome/gnucash
By the way, thanks everyone involved in this long and difficult GnuCash
2.0.0 development!
Cheers,
Eneko
El mar, 11-07-2006 a las 21:17 -0400, Chris Shoemaker escribió:
> Este mensaje ha sido analizad
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:50:09PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> Gnucash 2.0.0 has been uploaded to Debian, and seems to have
> successfully compiled on all current Debian archs that would be
> capable of it. (One cannot support guile at present, so of course not
> there.)
Thanks, Thomas
Gnucash 2.0.0 has been uploaded to Debian, and seems to have
successfully compiled on all current Debian archs that would be
capable of it. (One cannot support guile at present, so of course not
there.)
When the normal ten-day delay expires, if no Debian release-critical
bugs appear, it will mig
Dear all,
The work done to date on the G2 port is great - really. Not only because
it carries GNUCash forward on linux but also, it should I guess, make
a port to windows more possible; so there's a lot of value in the G2 work.
Perhaps all that goes without saying, but it's important its sai
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 21:09 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> 1. People want to know why gnucash is still transitioning, three years
> after gnome 2 started out. That's the big one.
Lack of developer resources. The person who started the port disappeared
after a couple of months. I picked it
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 21:09 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> The consequence would be that gnucash would have to get dropped from
> Debian until the gnome-2 branch can be built for Debian.
This is not unreasonable nor unexpected.
> There are some things that I have been asked; they are mean qu
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 5:09 am, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> The Debian gnome maintainers are increasingly antsy about gnome-1
> maintenance. I am being forced to maintain more and more of gnome-1
> since gnucash is the last or near last important gnome-1 application
> left. I'm fighting
The Debian gnome maintainers are increasingly antsy about gnome-1
maintenance. I am being forced to maintain more and more of gnome-1
since gnucash is the last or near last important gnome-1 application
left. I'm fighting the good fight, but it's possible I could lose.
The consequence would be
