Derek Atkins writes:
>
> An alternative approach: add to the Query object a "max return" value,
> so that a client can set the 'max number of Splits to return'. Then
> we don't necessarily need two RPCs; perhaps the Query RPC can return
> the actual number of matching splits, even though it only
Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CORBA would definitely support this sort of thing; probably the
> preferable approach would be to pass around sets of information as
> "sequences," which are usually represented as arrays of whatever
> structure is being referenced.
>
> If we have
On 18 Dec 2000 13:20:17 EST, the world broke into rejoicing as
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Gribble) writes:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:00:56PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > > This is a reasonable approach, although I think we still want (need?)
> > > t