On Thu, 31 May 2001 19:30:13 Herbert Thoma wrote:
> Klaus Ridder wrote:
> >
> > I totally agree: checkes are nearly not used here, focus on online
> banking
> > would be much more important.
>
> I agree, too.
>
A few points:
1) fixing check printing is a considerably smaller job than on
Klaus Ridder wrote:
>
> I totally agree: checkes are nearly not used here, focus on online banking
> would be much more important.
I agree, too.
> However, as spelled numbers in Germany are quite a mess, as far as I know
> the following method is also accepted in germany ( I have seen this a co
I totally agree: checkes are nearly not used here, focus on online banking
would be much more important.
However, as spelled numbers in Germany are quite a mess, as far as I know
the following method is also accepted in germany ( I have seen this a couple
of times):
"234 DM and 56 Pfennig" as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 00:15, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> on Australian cheques, the equivalent amount would be written
> as:
>
> "Two hundred and thirty-four dollars and fifty-six cents"
>
> and $234 would be written
>
> "Two hundred and thirty-four dollars
