Yeah, Frank used hte read-only github repos improperly and tried to
write into them. But the fact remains that code does use the maint
branch for docs.
-derek
Di Mang writes:
> Hello!
>
> I think, the reason for this behavior was the disappeared changes from "maint"
> brunch after merging with
Hello!
I think, the reason for this behavior was the disappeared changes from
"maint" brunch after merging with "master". See topic " strange behavior of
GitHub".
Best Regards,
Dmitriy
Am 27.07.2017 12:43 vorm. schrieb "Derek Atkins" :
Um, we DO build the maint branch of gnucash-docs.
-derek
Um, we DO build the maint branch of gnucash-docs.
-derek
"Frank H. Ellenberger" writes:
> Hi Derek,
>
> I am wondering if building the master branch of gnucash-docs is such a
> good solution.
>
> we have one or two documented features of the 2.8 serie in master but
> the bulk is done on maint:
Hi Derek,
I am wondering if building the master branch of gnucash-docs is such a
good solution.
we have one or two documented features of the 2.8 serie in master but
the bulk is done on maint: Almost daily improvements of the russian and
as spinoff german translation - thanks to Dmitry.
If I the
