On Sunday 24 November 2013 20:24:08 Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Samstag, 23. November 2013, 10:04:51 schrieb John Ralls:
> > The current guidance in the Wiki [1] (which I just copied to [2]) is
> > to put the SVN revision number of the trunk commit in the
> > backport's commit message. That's st
Am Samstag, 23. November 2013, 10:04:51 schrieb John Ralls:
> The current guidance in the Wiki [1] (which I just copied to [2]) is to put
> the SVN revision number of the trunk commit in the backport's commit
> message. That's still legitimate guidance until we switch, but what should
> we do in th
The current guidance in the Wiki [1] (which I just copied to [2]) is to put the
SVN revision number of the trunk commit in the backport's commit message.
That's still legitimate guidance until we switch, but what should we do in the
future? Short SHA1?
Do we want to keep the [rev-id] Subject fo
