On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 15:46 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Let me speak up in favor of the 80-char limit. However, I'm okay with
> treating it as "strongly encouraged" rather than rigorously enforced.
I think after discussion in #gnucash that we've come to consensus that
the goal is an 80-column
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 15:46 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> 2) encourage wrapping after the open parenthesis, e.g.:
>
> foo_is_a_short_name = but_these_names_are_rather_too_long(
> argument1, argument2, argument3, argument4);
>
> Do the ident settings permit 2)?
-nlp will tell ind
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:16:47AM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 23:46 -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> > -l80Line width of 80.
>
> This one I find problematic. I understand the arguments for it, and
> have made them myself. But identifiers and type names are just too long
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 23:46 -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> -l80 Line width of 80.
This one I find problematic. I understand the arguments for it, and
have made them myself. But identifiers and type names are just too long
these days. An 80-char limit can cause frequent and unnatural
line-breaki
